Cowboys Cuts-**Official cuts out**

Bunch of classy replies from cowboys fans on his post. Wonder which forum they belong to?
I guess they told him they weren't looking at him for the practice squad, or his agent told him other teams were calling already.
 
I guess they told him they weren't looking at him for the practice squad, or his agent told him other teams were calling already.

If other teams were calling, i would have think you could have gotten a 7 at least...maybe a 6th to replace the Swaim trade
 
Can other teams contact an agent before a player is available?
 
Cowboys waived RB Ben Malena.

A second-year undrafted free agent out of Texas A&M, Malena had a nice preseason, but couldn't crack the Cowboys' sorry running back corps. It's a sign he doesn't have much of an NFL future, though perhaps he'll land on the practice squad.
Source:Todd Archer on Twitter: Cowboys

You say that like Archer called the Cowboys Running Back Corps sorry... but he didn't. He just said they're cutting Malena and you added the rest.
 
Do writers always have to add their worthless opinion into reporting? Was the "couldn't crack the Cowboys' sorry running back corps" part even necessary?

That wasn't Archer's words... it was the posters. Here is what Archer said:

Told RB Ben Malena, DE Ben Gardner have been informed of release. Both could be practice squad candidates

The Sorry part was S&B's doing.
 
I didn't say anything I just copied the statement from yahoo. Must be one of their beat writers....

Ah, I see. My bad. Archer wrote: Told RB Ben Malena, DE Ben Gardner have been informed of release. Both could be practice squad candidates

It was in the link in your initial post. When you clicked on it, it goes to archers tweet... which isn't what was in that first post.

Sounds like something a Yahoo reporter would add to Archer's comments.
 
Ah, I see. My bad. Archer wrote: Told RB Ben Malena, DE Ben Gardner have been informed of release. Both could be practice squad candidates

It was in the link in your initial post. When you clicked on it, it goes to archers tweet... which isn't what was in that first post.

Sounds like something a Yahoo reporter would add to Archer's comments.

Yeah I saw that as well. Not sure why any place has to add any verbiage if it is a legit source. Just stick to what the source said.
 
I can see the Gardner cut...

He didn't have the burst nor the arm length for a 4-3 DE. I know there was experimentation as far as moving him inside but almost every DL except Gregory, Lawrence and Edwards is capable of playing a DT on a passing down... plus the two kids, Coleman & Bishop had strong camps as pure DT's...

Not enough rooms at the Inn I'm afraid.
 
Do writers always have to add their worthless opinion into reporting? Was the "couldn't crack the Cowboys' sorry running back corps" part even necessary?

What else would you expect from Todd "Sorry Arse" Archer?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,143
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top