DeaconMoss
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,409
- Reaction score
- 7,320
Sounds like we didn't tell him we'd bring him back to the PS.
Bunch of classy replies from cowboys fans on his post. Wonder which forum they belong to?
Sounds like we didn't tell him we'd bring him back to the PS.
It seems Efe has a higher ceiling due to being much more superior athlete. Gardner is a smart guy, whose best trait is motor.WE have Efe for 3 years to develop without the risk of losing him.
Why?Yeah, it was found out later that although the international player spot was on the books that when teams have asked the league office for the designation they have been refused.
I assume that was Silver's "catty" contribution and not Todd Archer's.
That does not sound like an Archer comment.
I guess they told him they weren't looking at him for the practice squad, or his agent told him other teams were calling already.Bunch of classy replies from cowboys fans on his post. Wonder which forum they belong to?
I guess they told him they weren't looking at him for the practice squad, or his agent told him other teams were calling already.
Where? On active roster or PS?
Cowboys waived RB Ben Malena.
A second-year undrafted free agent out of Texas A&M, Malena had a nice preseason, but couldn't crack the Cowboys' sorry running back corps. It's a sign he doesn't have much of an NFL future, though perhaps he'll land on the practice squad.
Source:Todd Archer on Twitter: Cowboys
Do writers always have to add their worthless opinion into reporting? Was the "couldn't crack the Cowboys' sorry running back corps" part even necessary?
You say that like Archer called the Cowboys Running Back Corps sorry... but he didn't. He just said they're cutting Malena and you added the rest.
I didn't say anything I just copied the statement from yahoo. Must be one of their beat writers....
Ah, I see. My bad. Archer wrote: Told RB Ben Malena, DE Ben Gardner have been informed of release. Both could be practice squad candidates
It was in the link in your initial post. When you clicked on it, it goes to archers tweet... which isn't what was in that first post.
Sounds like something a Yahoo reporter would add to Archer's comments.
why hasn't Vaughn been cut yet?
Yeah I saw that as well. Not sure why any place has to add any verbiage if it is a legit source. Just stick to what the source said.
why hasn't Vaughn been cut yet?
Do writers always have to add their worthless opinion into reporting? Was the "couldn't crack the Cowboys' sorry running back corps" part even necessary?