Your certainly entitled to your opinion but Id call it more of a questionable call than a peculiar decision. And it's even possible it set up the 3rd down TD beautifully ?It's not nitpicking when it's a huge call at a crucial part of the game. It's not nitpicking when it's a call that could easily have been avoided given the situation.
IN other words, yet again, at the end of a game, Garrett and company make a peculiar decision.
There's always a chance and why priority is scoring first. Teams just aren't on the most going to strategize assuming they can't make a stop.Yup. I'm fine with putting our fate in Zeke and OLs hand.
It's why I've never really argued about the Dez catch. Making that throw was stupid. We score there and we lose the game, period. There was ZERO chance we score there and win that game. ZERO. Romo should have dumped that pass to Bease, got the first down, and tried to milk the remaining clock. It was our only hope, and he should have known that. And I'm a Romosexual.
I've stated over and over the pass to Dez was a questionable call.I'm sorry but if you think that pass to Bryant had a higher chance of completion than Zeke getting 2 yards for a first down then you either were not watching the game or don't know football or are (most likely) just making excuses
Your entitled to believe as such but history won't be in your side .Rogers is not great
Are you saying Rodgers is an ordinary QB?the cowboys got beat because they have a really bad defense and their coaching is also not very good their defense makes ordinary qb look like joe montana
Your certainly entitled to your opinion but Id call it more of a questionable call than a peculiar decision. And it's even possible it set up the 3rd down TD beautifully ?
Perhaps you like Jerrys words better. He called it a " hard call".That just seems like semantics............ questionable call versus peculiar decision.
I wouldn't call Goff greatness. He certainly didn't beat us in the same fashion Rodgers did. But Goff looks like an up and coming QB worthy of his 1st rd selection and Gurley is already one of the best RB in the league.so I guess jared goff and gurley are greatness then no Rodgers Is not ordinary but the cowboys should of won that game tarence willams and a bad play call lost that game
It looks more lopsided to me with our defense against their QB.It's not like we been getting dominated by the packers. Every game been close except for the one we won against them. We're even in the field, but it's a lopsided defeat on the sideline
And they probably feel the same way about their defense against us. We always put up points against them and we don't do no trickery (like trying to catch them with twelve guys on the field and snapping the ball), get no benefit from the refs and we damn sure don't get turnovers let alone defensive tds.It looks more lopsided to me with our defense against their QB.
But no doubt I'd give the Packers coaching staff the nod over ours as well. And probably their front office too.
Losing to Pittsburg twice in the Super Bowl is still painful 40 years later, I don't care how great they were.I understand but that doesn't change talents like Rodgers increases the chance of success.
Much like in our glory years it lessened the blow and softened the pain of losing to some of the greatest teams like the Packers of the 60's and Steelers in 70's. No shame in losing to greatness.
And we had great teams that had an opportunity to win and could have been considered greater if we had. It illustrates again how 1 play or plays even a player often make a difference and decide your fate influencing destiny .
There's always a chance and why priority is scoring first. Teams just aren't on the most going to strategize assuming they can't make a stop.