Video: Cowboys Harsh Truth: There is No ‘War Daddy’ in Their Future

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
36,648
Reaction score
31,939
http://sportdfw.com/2017/03/19/cowboys-harsh-truth-there-is-no-war-daddy-in-their-future/

Planning to add a double-digit sack defensive end this off season isn’t just wishful for the Dallas Cowboys– it’s highly unrealistic. It’s time to adjust expectations.


It’s no secret the Dallas Cowboys want a double-digit sack machine to man the right defensive end spot. A “war daddy”, as owner Jerry Jones calls him, has been on the Cowboys wish list ever since the now-retired Demarcus Ware was released three seasons ago.

Unfortunately for the Cowboys (and 50% of the NFL) finding a war-daddy isn’t that easy.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
36,648
Reaction score
31,939
If the Cowboys are going to have a "war daddy" next season, that guy is already on the team and just hasn't hit his stride yet. The idea of acquiring that talent through free agency, even if only remotely considered a "war daddy" just isn't going to happen.

Then there is the draft... it's not like the FO hasn't been trying. Gregory is bust. DLaw is inconsistent. I hope they keep trying but I don't hold out hope for that to be the solution.
 

Sandyf

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,248
Reaction score
1,379
Did everyone forget the way Marinelli runs his defense? It is a rotation defense to keep fresh rushers, it is not the Parcells defense where a Ware stayed on the field the whole game. Our D-line does not play anywhere near a 100 percent of the defensive snaps in a game. If you want to use Jerry's words (big mistake) of "a" war daddy, it should really "2" war daddies because you really are counting on two guys at a spot (i.e. RDE) to get 12 to 15 sacks a year or more.

Even if we had the opportunity to draft Garrett, he would only play probably at the most 60 percent of the D snaps. Something to think about.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Did everyone forget the way Marinelli runs his defense? It is a rotation defense to keep fresh rushers, it is not the Parcells defense where a Ware stayed on the field the whole game. Our D-line does not play anywhere near a 100 percent of the defensive snaps in a game. If you want to use Jerry's words (big mistake) of "a" war daddy, it should really "2" war daddies because you really are counting on two guys at a spot (i.e. RDE) to get 12 to 15 sacks a year or more.

Even if we had the opportunity to draft Garrett, he would only play probably at the most 60 percent of the D snaps. Something to think about.
5 rushmen equals 1 war daddy. Everyone knows that.
 

Deep_Freeze

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,225
Reaction score
3,442
Did everyone forget the way Marinelli runs his defense? It is a rotation defense to keep fresh rushers, it is not the Parcells defense where a Ware stayed on the field the whole game. Our D-line does not play anywhere near a 100 percent of the defensive snaps in a game. If you want to use Jerry's words (big mistake) of "a" war daddy, it should really "2" war daddies because you really are counting on two guys at a spot (i.e. RDE) to get 12 to 15 sacks a year or more.

Even if we had the opportunity to draft Garrett, he would only play probably at the most 60 percent of the D snaps. Something to think about.

Sounds good until we get caught with 12 guys on the field.

Against a veteran quality QB, just leave them in for a series.
 

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903
War daddy is an old term. Started in the 50s in Mississippi College Football

http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2005/02/whos_your_war_daddy.html

http://grantland.com/features/bill-belichick-vince-wilfork-new-england-patriots-defense/

http://www.definitions.net/definition/war daddy

https://mobile.twitter.com/wardaddylinemen

wardaddylinemen
 
Top