Here's the next question? Will he hold out?
This!With Dak and his team out of their minds about his value, and their harda$$ refusal to negotiate, they should have used the non exclusive tag on his butt. They think between now and July they are going to agree ? Nuts. Should have used non exclusive and made moves for future without Dak.
I still haven't seen a source for these higher numbers you have been saying. That being did it is on the Cowboys for not offering this deal last year. Then Dak only making $2 million would have pushed the AAV down down to $28 million. They been lowballing him the whole time so the price is only going to go up. If Dak plays the whole year on the tag then the price goes up again.
This is great! Trade him for a 2 and 5 and let the rebuild began!Yes. He's already stated he is not reporting without a long term deal.
I hope so!Could be wrong, but I suspect this means Dak sits out the OTA's and, possibly, TC.
From what I've seen it is the Cowboys that want it both ways. They don't want to set the market but they also want Dak to sign a 6 or 7 year dea . That isn't a fair deal on its face, and I haven't even brought up the new tv money which will cause an even bigger jump in the cap. There were reports that qbs could be making $70 million a year in 7 years.
Maybe you should have made that same consideration before you tried to lecture others about how they should feel? I guess when it comes to you and your viewpoint, the 'rules' are then different? In case, you haven't noticed, that is the double standard that you're displaying that I am pointing out to you.
I think his agent knows.Does he? We'll soon see.
It won’t be Rush if Mr. average at best is not on the roster and I hope he’s not!or he just won't play and sit out. that'll be great for the team. can't wait to see rush play!
An I haven't seen any sources that confirm what it is that you are saying. I said up front, nobody knows but we have seen tweets from people close to the organization that have provided this info. It's not confirmed for sure but it's a reasonable as anything CBS has put out there and probably even more so.
Chiefs didn’t overpay for anyone? Sammy Watkins says “Hello!”.Good teams understand how to maximize returns on players
Those teams that overpay for talent don't play in the last game of the year. Look at the Ravens after winning the super bowl, overpaid for Flacco didn't even make the playoffs until after he was benched.
Well I agree there. But if he asks for 40 and they give him 40....what do you call that?Respectfully disagree. Its what the team determines is his worth. Ultimately its the team that has to pay what they deem is fair. Players have inflated self worth.
I still haven't seen a source for these higher numbers you have been saying. That being did it is on the Cowboys for not offering this deal last year. Then Dak only making $2 million would have pushed the AAV down down to $28 million. They been lowballing him the whole time so the price is only going to go up. If Dak plays the whole year on the tag then the price goes up again.
Why in the world would the team offer those number last year? What GM, in their right mind, would offer those numbers to Dak last year? Why would they have done that? As I said, we've been over this. You just don't seem to want to listen. France and CAA were never going to sign a long term deal. So basically, we would have been paying those numbers to Dak for a period of a few years and the minute the CAA and Mohomes' new deal was in place, we would have been right back at the table. Why in the world would the team have done that?