Beast_from_East
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 30,376
- Reaction score
- 27,560
Almost $3 million a season for a blocking TE that had 9 receptions last year?
Seems like we overpaid.
Seems like we overpaid.
There is one I dont have a problem with. Like to see him get his hands on the ball in space once in a while.
Almost $3 million a season for a blocking TE that had 9 receptions last year?
Seems like we overpaid.
Cowboys ought to just close up shop right now when it comes to free agency.
A+ Baby!
Almost $3 million a season for a blocking TE that had 9 receptions last year?
Seems like we overpaid.
I agree, and Henry fits the bill. WE all know though, Dallas isn't proactive. So unless Witten got hurt before the draft somehow, we aren't drafting a TE
Now we ain't gotta draft one in the 2nd!
I didn't think we'd bring him back with Witten, Escobar and Swaim already on the roster. I guess the team feels he's needed as a blocking tight end.
Escobar is going to be very limited going into this season, and my guess is they don't re-sign him.
Now we don't have to re-address the tight end position next year.
I could see questions about Escobar's availability being the reason for this re-signing. Of course, the team also doesn't know what it has in Swaim. One thing we do know right now is that Hanna's a better blocker than either of them.
Move makes 100 percent sense. I think Swaim barely made the team last year and wasn't as strong a blocker as they hoped he would be.
If he develops in year two, that's great, but now we don't have to scramble to find another tight end next year if Swaim isn't what we think he could be (and as a 7th round pick, he probably isn't).
So we resigned him to be the blocking TE?
So what does that mean for the Geoff Swaim trade?
All aboard the mediocrity train. Our staff has no clue how to use TE's effectively.
Almost $3 million a season for a blocking TE that had 9 receptions last year?
Seems like we overpaid.