Cowboys release TO *Merged*

burmafrd;2669062 said:
Everything is off of BSPN. Is it possible- being this late at night- that this is BS?

Yep, just a smoke screen. Jerry's going to invade Mexico manana.
 
cowboyeric8;2669044 said:
Besides pout during the offseason about his roll. What has he ever done? He is a veteran on this team who is constant contributer, during the season its just business.

Tired of these whinny millionaires whinning about their roll on this or that. Lets clean up the team, I'm all for that.

Started with Pacman, Tank, Now TO, why stop there? Isn't there supposed to be some rat mark that spills his guts at every opportunity? Axe his rear end also.
 
wileedog;2669046 said:
You asked if there were real internal problems, or if the Cowboys cut him because the media follows him everywhere.

I chose to discount the latter because its the stupidest damn thing I have ever heard, and in fact it is something that would endear TO to Jerry.

Not a strawman, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that your are not a moron.

Is it?

It's not necessarily T.O. that distracts the Cowboys. It's what he brings to a team.

We all know he didn't get cut because of his production. It was because of the distraction. T.O. never called out Romo. He didn't do any of the things he did in other cities. T.O. was cut because of the constant media strain and pressure/distractions from the media.

I'm assuming Jerry finally listened to certain players/coaches and realized that all the stuff that went on this past year distracted the team in a negative manner. He made the change that he felt was necessary.
 
wileedog;2669046 said:
You asked if there were real internal problems, or if the Cowboys cut him because the media follows him everywhere.

Yes, I asked someone who had access to inside information. And "following him everywhere" was simply a hyperbole, used to imply drama caused by the media. It wasn't literal, because obviously the media doesn't follow anyone everywhere.

I chose to discount the latter because its the stupidest damn thing I have ever heard,

Perhaps if you understood what I was saying, then you might realize that your assumption was even stupider.

and in fact it is something that would endear TO to Jerry.

Wrong. It would only endear him to TO if it didn't affect winning.

Not a strawman, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that your are not a moron.

Yes, it is. I never implied that the positions were mutually exclusive, because if they were, then Hos wouldn't have answered "a little bit of both."
 
We need SPEED - even if it's not from the #1 or #2 WR. If you can't stretch the defense and toss the deep ball - every defense will play up, blanket the slow receivers and stop the run. That means we must find a FA with speed or draft a guy with huge potential. Otherwise, I'm afraid we'll see an entire season of dink and dump short passes.
 
Bad move. Haven't seen anything from Garrett that indicates he can scheme an offense; without D's double teaming and shifting players towards TO, don't see how the receivers get open.

Next season, teams will put extra men in the box to stop the run, and double team Witten.

I guess we will see just how good Garrett is.
 
NextGenBoys;2669079 said:
We all know he didn't get cut because of his production. It was because of the distraction. T.O. never called out Romo. He didn't do any of the things he did in other cities. T.O. was cut because of the constant media strain and pressure/distractions from the media.

Complete and total speculation. Again, Romo appears weekly in the tabloids with Jessica and he is clearly being handed the reigns to this team.

There had to be a divisive force going on in the locker room, despite everyone protests to the opposite, or TO is being held to a standard that Romo is not.

That is possible, granted, but given TO's history it is far more likely the Werder's of the world found an acorn and were right that there were seriously problems with TO and other players.
 
btgboys41;2668386 said:
When do we hear from Chad Johnson?

May you owe the Mafia a huge sum of money and have the ghost of Howard Cosell do your funeral.
 
EveryoneElse;2669078 said:
Started with Pacman, Tank, Now TO, why stop there? Isn't there supposed to be some rat mark that spills his guts at every opportunity? Axe his rear end also.

brady%20qunn.jpg
 
Epic Prediction:

TO goes to New England and gets 2-3 Super Bowl rings and prances into the HOF tossing up 2 birdies and a partridge in a pear tree....:eek::eek::eek:
 
wileedog;2669072 said:
If 4 out of 11 defensive players are covering 2 guys and we can't move the ball with the RBs we have than we suck anyway, and weren't winning anything even with TO.

So then it makes sense to make it even HARDER to move the ball?

How does cutting TO make the offensive line get younger and learn how to block for the run or the pass?

This offense is in BIG trouble next year unless some wheeling and dealing is done.
 
CowboyFan74;2669102 said:
Epic Prediction:

TO goes to New England and gets 2-3 Super Bowl rings and prances into the HOF tossing up 2 birdies and a partridge in a pear tree....:eek::eek::eek:
:lmao:
 
wileedog;2669097 said:
Complete and total speculation. Again, Romo appears weekly in the tabloids with Jessica and he is clearly being handed the reigns to this team.

There had to be a divisive force going on in the locker room, despite everyone protests to the opposite, or TO is being held to a standard that Romo is not.

That is possible, granted, but given TO's history it is far more likely the Werder's of the world found an acorn and were right that there were seriously problems with TO and other players.

It is speculation. But what other logical reason is there?

And you're correct. TO is being held to a standard Romo is not. It's just Romo hasn't carried the baggage TO has for his entire career.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,113
Messages
13,789,531
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top