News: Cowboys Trade for Christine Michael per Schefter

I'll never understand how twisted up some get over adding another back. Maybe it's anxiety over the fact what they thought the team had, they didn't. At least as far as the FO saw it. I think going 4 deep at RB is where you want to be in a committee. I'm excited about CM. Every back here knows he can look good and eventually get paid by running hard for this team.

This RBBC needs 4 backs. No one is going to get 250+ carries.
 
I'm glad that we concluded, from the very beginning, you were talking out of your ***. I figured you read a single article and made your conclusion in a hurry. Thanks for wasting my time with making it seem you had information on his character.

You're either an Aggie fanboy or you literally don't know who Christine Michael is. Or maybe you're just a troll. Either way, good luck with that Christine Michael Cowboys jersey.
 
Look, the guy was third on the Seahawks depth chart because the coaches wouldn't trust him and he has never demonstrated the maturity to put in the work to get better at any of the things keeping him off of the field. He's going to have to prove that the light has come on for him if he wants to keep his roster spot here. If he turns it around, he has a chance to be good, but those types of success stories are generally the exception to the rule.

Did you just make that up? He was 3rd in their depth chart because Lynch is their starter and their a one back offense. They also signed Fred Jackson as an insurance policy and decided they wanted to keep Rawls. There was nothing there that said the coach didn't trust him and that he was lazy.
 
Did you just make that up? He was 3rd in their depth chart because Lynch is their starter and their a one back offense. They also signed Fred Jackson as an insurance policy and decided they wanted to keep Rawls. There was nothing there that said the coach didn't trust him and that he was lazy.

Not much of a point to keeping Michael considering he is a FA after 2016 and they just extended Lynch so they will still be paying Lynch when Michaels contract is up
 
You're either an Aggie fanboy or you literally don't know who Christine Michael is. Or maybe you're just a troll. Either way, good luck with that Christine Michael Cowboys jersey.

Nope, just hate misinformation being spread. I pushed you, you had nothing to back it up. Your claims didn't hold up under scrutiny. From the very beginning, you could have stated things like they were speculation and chose to post as though they were facts. Sorry that someone did the absurd thing and asked you to back up the claims.

I'm still waiting on that link that says he's lazy and doesn't work to improve his game. I won't hold my breath though.
 
does he keep his 33 Jersey number with the Cowboys? More than likely right? 33 was used by Malena and now he is gone.
 
No but Randle does

If Randle is slated to be the starting running back, then he won't be on special teams this season.

Which will hurt the coverage teams on kickoffs, because he was a solid contributor there.
 
If Randle is slated to be the starting running back, then he won't be on special teams this season.

Which will hurt the coverage teams on kickoffs, because he was a solid contributor there.

But he can play ST when and if Michael overtakes him
 
Not much of a point to keeping Michael considering he is a FA after 2016 and they just extended Lynch so they will still be paying Lynch when Michaels contract is up

I think Michaels is talented to start on any team especially the Cowboys. He just got caught in the numbers game and that they signed Lynch to a new contract he probably won't see much action this year as well. Jackson and Rawls are going to be backups and insurance if Lynch goes down. Thus they didn't need another insurance policy with CMike.
 
existingRB.png

Man you know the cap and the stats :) Great stuff , this guy looks fast, big and strong. Go Cowboys:starspin:
 
Nope, just hate misinformation being spread. I pushed you, you had nothing to back it up. Your claims didn't hold up under scrutiny. From the very beginning, you could have stated things like they were speculation and chose to post as though they were facts. Sorry that someone did the absurd thing and asked you to back up the claims.

I'm still waiting on that link that says he's lazy and doesn't work to improve his game. I won't hold my breath though.

I find it sad that you need a single internet source to say something verbatim for you to accept it, rather than being able to read multiple sources, self-educate, and reach a logical conclusion.

Anyway, the word I used was immature, not lazy. Please stop making things up as you go along. It's incredibly obnoxious.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,125
Messages
13,790,186
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top