Cowboys Vs Commanders ***Game Thread***

We need a grind it out drive that pust 7 on the board and takes time off the clock. C-min guys, lets see if we deserve this win.
 
wxcpo;1141480 said:
Whatever. Like the rules isn't a ******* one. Oh well your sorry team let'em off the hook anyways.


whatever. what i said is true. he is a ******* 'me first guy' who could have cost his team field position. you should be proud.
 
skinsngibbs4life;1141503 said:
the rule is you cant get on the ground during the celebration. Hence why TO got called and portis didnt

Well, the rule is "excessive celebration." There are things that are tied to it, like using the football as a prop, or (according to the commentators so excuse me if I take this with a grain of salt) lying on the ground. Although the latter two are sufficient conditions to call the penalty, they aren't necessary.

Apparently Portis celebrated excessively, so he should have been called for it.
 
skinsngibbs4life;1141519 said:
im not sayin that it isn't stupid. I was just saying why it was enforced on one and not the other


Nope ..... just like every other Commander troll, you always have excuses for your guys ..... but no others.
 
HeavyHitta31;1141513 said:
Maybe, maybe not, but that sack and ownage of Samuels definitly was :lmao2:
Leave it to HH to be wrong, ALL THE TIME. That was Fauria again, not Samuels.
 
not to beat the dead horse but yeah skyler green just terrible where is woody dantzler when you need him????? seriously?
 
We need to knock Loyd on his butt before he gets in his route.
 
1st and 10 Dallas:

Romo play fake throws the ball away on a busted screen.
 
skinsngibbs4life;1141519 said:
im not sayin that it isn't stupid. I was just saying why it was enforced on one and not the other

I understand that....the NFL needs to re-examine their rules though...they pump these guys up as the ones to watch, and this is one reason why people watch. The celebrations, etc. Yet, then they penalize THAT?

Too many "two-faced" policies by the NFL.
 
HeavyHitta31;1141513 said:
Maybe, maybe not, but that sack and ownage of Samuels definitly was :lmao2:

he gave up a huge sack 2 plays later- he needs tro be cut.
 
riggo;1141525 said:
whatever. what i said is true. he is a ******* 'me first guy' who could have cost his team field position. you should be proud.

You mean like Sean Taylor? cept without the guns and rap sheet?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,483
Messages
13,878,007
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top