Chasing6
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 15,854
- Reaction score
- 8,614
Nothing wrong with turning over every rock.
Accept the FA rocks that are looking at you in the face.
Nothing wrong with turning over every rock.
Loooooool funniest thing ever lolWhen does the UFL get to have tryouts for our DT's?
Aubrey is an excellent kicker.
Turpin is a great end of roster special teamer who can elevate in packages, but it has been 3 years.
You are trolling the UFL for players hoping to improve the bottom of your roster. If you land on something more than that it is frankly dumb luck.
This guy is obviously behind the Rookie, Micah, Kneeland and Sam on a roster this season even if he is special.
His most likely landing spot would the practice squad unless they think he is another undersized 3T type they can rotate in.
Using two 3 techs at DT makes you inherently weak vs the run. It's not just about "finding a good football player."We get too caught up in 1 tech or 3 tech. Who cares. Can we just find a good football player to play DT?
I think they already cut them!!!!When does the UFL get to have tryouts for our DT's?
Yeah, we might even win one playoff game!!!!Wouldn’t be easier if the Cowboys just moved to the UFL?
I'm not sure how to say this but I stand by what I saidAubrey is an excellent kicker.
Turpin is a great end of roster special teamer who can elevate in packages, but it has been 3 years.
You are trolling the UFL for players hoping to improve the bottom of your roster. If you land on something more than that it is frankly dumb luck.
This guy is obviously behind the Rookie, Micah, Kneeland and Sam on a roster this season even if he is special.
His most likely landing spot would the practice squad unless they think he is another undersized 3T type they can rotate in.
And Kurt Warner was bagging groceries.
While I agree with you, I also agree you never know.
That and its hard to crap on our track record with UFL.
Yes, I'm not saying to use obviously out of position players at say the nose tackle position. We need beefier guys at the 1 tech. All I'm saying is we are not looking at the entire picture sometimes when it comes to the player and his tape. If the tape says a player plays well at the 1 tech in college, even if he doesn't meet our measurables (undersized and has short arms for example), why are we not just taking guys and seeing what they can do? For example, the geniuses in the scouting department thought Mazi Smith met the criteria of what a 1 tech is, but what they forgot was, to ask themselves a couple questions, does he have the drive, does he get the job done? Size doesn't always mean they can be a good player at the 1 tech. Look at EVERYTHING is all I'm saying. I finally think we are doing so but time will tell.Using two 3 techs at DT makes you inherently weak vs the run. It's not just about "finding a good football player."
Like I said before, I'm just asking for 1 good to great player at the 1 tech. Preferably beefy but that's not the end all be all. Just want a guy that plays his tail off and holds the point enough so the guys can rally to the ball.Using two 3 techs at DT makes you inherently weak vs the run. It's not just about "finding a good football player."
I am too.......I just wish that we could get a player like Pickens in free agency or trade more often than every 6 or 7 years. I believe Amari in 2018 was our last proven ballerI'm all for anyone who can help this team.
My only issue is it's kind of a waste if they don't go for it or extend him.I am too.......I just wish that we could get a player like Pickens in free agency or trade more often than every 6 or 7 years. I believe Amari in 2018 was our last proven baller
And even more important, does he have the burst and lateral agility(no).Yes, I'm not saying to use obviously out of position players at say the nose tackle position. We need beefier guys at the 1 tech. All I'm saying is we are not looking at the entire picture sometimes when it comes to the player and his tape. If the tape says a player plays well at the 1 tech in college, even if he doesn't meet our measurables (undersized and has short arms for example), why are we not just taking guys and seeing what they can do? For example, the geniuses in the scouting department thought Mazi Smith met the criteria of what a 1 tech is, but what they forgot was, to ask themselves a couple questions, does he have the drive, does he get the job done? Size doesn't always mean they can be a good player at the 1 tech. Look at EVERYTHING is all I'm saying. I finally think we are doing so but time will tell.
Mazi was a huge miss by the coaching staff, thinking they could turn him into something he could never become.And even more important, does he have the burst and lateral agility(no).
You are describing a 3 technique, right ...And even more important, does he have the burst and lateral agility(no).
Mazi I would not take him down to 260 and still expect a trash can full of dirt. You?Mazi was a huge miss by the coaching staff, thinking they could turn him into something he could never become.
Hopefully Mazi is back to who he was, and let's find out if he can impact the game being himself.
If he can eat up space and let our LB's roam freely, I couldn't care less about his stats.
No. A NT also needs to be able to move laterally to shore up the middle, and if he doesn't have enough burst off the snap the OL will get under his pads and push him back. Those are the two reasons Mazi isn't good.You are describing a 3 technique, right ...
Maybe we should trade the Bengals for the #1 pick, since they don't want to sign him, and add another DE.could be another good find for the bottom 10 players.
but DE is not a spot i lose sleep over.