Chuck 54
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 20,076
- Reaction score
- 12,052
Hmmm.....a Cowherdzone?How about merging this with the other Cowherd threads? Seems we are going to get a Cowherd opinion every day now?
Hmmm.....a Cowherdzone?How about merging this with the other Cowherd threads? Seems we are going to get a Cowherd opinion every day now?
Well said. Very."Deserve" is a meaningless term in Pro Sports.
Players get paid millions because of supply and demand.
Soldiers that are at high risk of being maimed or killed "deserve" more than Pro Athletes but the pool of available candidates to become soldiers is likely in the millions as compared to the pool of player with the ability to become Pro Athletes which in the case of the NFL is a couple of thousand.
I feel exactly the same way.I disagree with him on the new onside kick proposal. The proposal is the gimmick. You're not meant to have the ball twice in a row in football. They only way to do it is to have the ball travel 10 yards from a kickoff and recover it. Not give the ball back to the quarterback after you score.
The NFL has ruined the onside kick with their rule changes putting themselves in a position where the only way to compensate for that is to find a gimmick.
Yeah, it's just when he gets signed, I hope it's after they cut CrawfordI do like the NFL trust fund kid thing
That was clever and true
Other that, he's getting signed regardless of what others say
As for his comments on defense, he glassed over all the additions and focused only on the losses.
"Deserve" is a meaningless term in Pro Sports.
Players get paid millions because of supply and demand.
Soldiers that are at high risk of being maimed or killed "deserve" more than Pro Athletes but the pool of available candidates to become soldiers is likely in the millions as compared to the pool of player with the ability to become Pro Athletes which in the case of the NFL is a couple of thousand.
I'd much rather keep Crawford at an affordable rate. He's a very nice rotational player, just get him down to around 2-3 mil/season, and he's a huge plus.Yeah, it's just when he gets signed, I hope it's after they cut Crawford
Good points. Which is exactly why QB contracts are so high.
Because despite what some posters on this board think. It’s far from “easy” to find QB’s who can play at Prescott’s level. And NFL teams use 10’s of millions of dollars in contracts and a lot of VERY valuable draft picks, trying to find them.
Hmmm.....a Cowherdzone?
I feel exactly the same way.
Does that mean if a team that is winning scores late and wants the ball back, they can also take it at 4th and 15?
I don't want Crawford at any rate -guy is always hurt and is of very little use.I'd much rather keep Crawford at an affordable rate. He's a very nice rotational player, just get him down to around 2-3 mil/season, and he's a huge plus.
The Eagles did not improve at Wr. They have the same as last year who were mostly injured (Jeffries and Jackson) and a rookie in Reagor. I don’t see how that is improving. If that is improving than his points of the Cowboys not addressing the defense with their safety and CB leaving is moot since they did sign Dix and drafted Diggs and other CB from Tulsa. Colon needs to his homework before he shoots his mouth off but that will be asking too much.