Current Draft Order

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
I am not figuring any tie breakers yet. I'm not slotting playoff seeds higher. Also not switching traded picks. Just slotting the teams on the winning % of their 2006 opponents.

1. Arizona Cardinals, 1-7, .531

2. Detroit Lions, 2-6, .508
T3. Houston Texans, 2-6, .516
T3. Cleveland Browns, 2-6, .516
T3. Miami Dolphins, 2-6, .516
T6. Oakland Raiders, 2-6, .523
T6. Pittsburgh Steelers, 2-6, .523
8. Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 2-6, .570
9. Tennessee Titans, 2-6, .578

10. Green Bay Packers, 3-5, .492
11. San Francisco 49ers, 3-5, .508
12. Buffalo Bills, 3-5, .539
13. Washington Commanders, 3-5, .547

T14. Minnesota Vikings, 4-4, .461
T14. New York Jets, 4-4, .461
16. St. Louis Rams, 4-4, .469
17. Dallas Cowboys, 4-4, .492
18. Carolina Panthers, 4-4, .508
19. Philadelphia Eagles, 4-4, .516
20. Cincinnati Bengals, 4-4, .547

21. Atlanta Falcons, 5-3, .453
22. Seattle Seahawks, 5-3, .461
23. Kansas City Chiefs, 5-3, .484
24. Jacksonville Jaguars, 5-3, .492

25. Baltimore Ravens, 6-2, .442
26. San Diego Chargers, 6-2, .453
27. New Orleans Saints, 6-2, .461
28. New England Patriots, 6-2, .500
29. Denver Broncos, 6-2, .523
30. New York Giants, 6-2, .531

31. Chicago Bears, 7-1, .422

32. Indianapolis Colts, 8-0, .469
 

Aikbach

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,746
Reaction score
42
How did you devise those percentages out of equal records? Did you formulate a strength of schedule or something?
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Aikbach;1149369 said:
How did you devise those percentages out of equal records? Did you formulate a strength of schedule or something?
I made a program that has the entire season's schedule already entered. Then all I have to do is add a win when a team wins and a loss when they lose and it automatically calculates the %s.
 

Hailmary

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,117
Reaction score
1,870
if we do end up picking in the middle somewhere, my pre-combine wishlist would include either Levi Brown or Jake Long, both offensive linemen.

If not, OL, then I would hope Dwayne Jarrett would fall to us. He's probably not going to come close to his last year numbers, so I'm hoping he slides a little, but his stock could also skyrocket if he runs a good 40.

Number 3 on the wishlist would be a stud CB.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Hailmary;1149378 said:
if we do end up picking in the middle somewhere, my pre-combine wishlist would include either Levi Brown or Jake Long, both offensive linemen.

If not, OL, then I would hope Dwayne Jarrett would fall to us. He's probably not going to come close to his last year numbers, so I'm hoping he slides a little, but his stock could also skyrocket if he runs a good 40.

Number 3 on the wishlist would be a stud CB.
FS, Laron Landry, of LSU is still on top of my wish list. I like Pat Watkins, Landry is a difference maker.

If a QB is there I think we have to consider it. OL is definitely a top need.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
I covered Dwayne Jarret in HS. He was just a frosh though so he wasnt "too" dangerous.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
Hostile;1149366 said:
I am not figuring any tie breakers yet. I'm not slotting playoff seeds higher. Also not switching traded picks. Just slotting the teams on the winning % of their 2006 opponents.

1. Arizona Cardinals, 1-7, .531

2. Detroit Lions, 2-6, .508
T3. Houston Texans, 2-6, .516
T3. Cleveland Browns, 2-6, .516
T3. Miami Dolphins, 2-6, .516
T6. Oakland Raiders, 2-6, .523
T6. Pittsburgh Steelers, 2-6, .523
8. Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 2-6, .570
9. Tennessee Titans, 2-6, .578

10. Green Bay Packers, 3-5, .492
11. San Francisco 49ers, 3-5, .508
12. Buffalo Bills, 3-5, .539
13. Washington Commanders, 3-5, .547

T14. Minnesota Vikings, 4-4, .461
T14. New York Jets, 4-4, .461
16. St. Louis Rams, 4-4, .469
17. Dallas Cowboys, 4-4, .492
18. Carolina Panthers, 4-4, .508
19. Philadelphia Eagles, 4-4, .516
20. Cincinnati Bengals, 4-4, .547

21. Atlanta Falcons, 5-3, .453
22. Seattle Seahawks, 5-3, .461
23. Kansas City Chiefs, 5-3, .484
24. Jacksonville Jaguars, 5-3, .492

25. Baltimore Ravens, 6-2, .442
26. San Diego Chargers, 6-2, .453
27. New Orleans Saints, 6-2, .461
28. New England Patriots, 6-2, .500
29. Denver Broncos, 6-2, .523
30. New York Giants, 6-2, .531

31. Chicago Bears, 7-1, .422

32. Indianapolis Colts, 8-0, .469
so who would you wanna draft? i think we will keep romo.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
I have some favoritism w. Michigan but Long is a great OT which could be a very viable option and if we want CB early Hall has been a stand out this year (not sure if it would be a stretch though).
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
I still wanna give Watkins a better shot and some time to develope personally.. so I would stay away from FS.
 

CowboyStar88

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,181
Reaction score
25,572
i like that safety from florida he is pretty good also..and that wr they have bubba caldwell or something i think his name is
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Hostile;1149366 said:
21. Atlanta Falcons, 5-3, .453
22. Seattle Seahawks, 5-3, .461
23. Kansas City Chiefs, 5-3, .484
24. Jacksonville Jaguars, 5-3, .492

25. Baltimore Ravens, 6-2, .442
26. San Diego Chargers, 6-2, .453
27. New Orleans Saints, 6-2, .461
28. New England Patriots, 6-2, .500
29. Denver Broncos, 6-2, .523
30. New York Giants, 6-2, .531

31. Chicago Bears, 7-1, .422

32. Indianapolis Colts, 8-0, .469
I was looking at these teams and thinking. That's almost the 12 playoff teams as it stands right now. All 8 division leaders are there. The problem is there are 7 AFC teams and 5 NFC teams.

If you went strictly by the draft order (Yes, I know they won't end up this way) KC would be out and Philly in.

I do think it's safe to say that 7 of the 8 division leaders at the halfway point all have their divisions in jeopardy. The Broncos and Chargers are in a dogfight for the AFC West. The rest not so much.

We figured the NFC East was the best division in football prior to the season. I think the AFC West might argue that.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
I think that after looking at last night and knowing how messed up the Cards are that the Raiders and Cards will be one and two in some order.Houston 3; browns 4. Detroit seems to be getting its O together so I put them at 5.
After that who knows. with 8 games to go its going to get jumbled all over. I wonder what the draft order looked like this time last year, and then compare it with the actual 2006 draft.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Hostile;1149385 said:
FS, Laron Landry, of LSU is still on top of my wish list. I like Pat Watkins, Landry is a difference maker.

If a QB is there I think we have to consider it. OL is definitely a top need.

If we take another freaking FS and rely on a rookie again I'm gonna shoot myself. Give me a WR. I think Purcells will churn the roster, and look for late talent along the OL, unless an absolute can't miss falls to us.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
burmafrd;1149486 said:
I think that after looking at last night and knowing how messed up the Cards are that the Raiders and Cards will be one and two in some order.Houston 3; browns 4. Detroit seems to be getting its O together so I put them at 5.
After that who knows. with 8 games to go its going to get jumbled all over. I wonder what the draft order looked like this time last year, and then compare it with the actual 2006 draft.
You know what frustrates the crap out of me about that list?

Last year we had the 18 pick. I just knew this year would be such an improvement. I think we all did. I expected to challenge for the division crown.

I didn't expect to be picking lower than we did last year. Lot of season left, but seeing that 17 next to our name pisses me off.
 

Hailmary

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,117
Reaction score
1,870
superpunk;1149497 said:
If we take another freaking FS and rely on a rookie again I'm gonna shoot myself. Give me a WR. I think Purcells will churn the roster, and look for late talent along the OL, unless an absolute can't miss falls to us.

I think watkins will be improved w/ an offseason of film watching, and strength and conditioning.

OL remains our top priority. I'm sick of patchwork offensive lines bringing in players past their prime mixed in w/ 2nd day draft picks.

WR is also high on my list. I'm hoping Jarrett has the flu during his pro day and runs an unspectacular 40 so he slips to us. I don't think he'll make an impact right away like Calvin Johnson (he's rail thin and will need a year to add bulk), ,but I like his long term potential.
 

the kid 05

Individuals play the game, but teams beat the odds
Messages
9,543
Reaction score
3
Hostile;1149377 said:
I made a program that has the entire season's schedule already entered. Then all I have to do is add a win when a team wins and a loss when they lose and it automatically calculates the %s.

:pc: :geek:

:D
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Columbo is worrying me with his mistakes. So maybe another OT. Proctor needs some playing time to see if he can replace Rivera. Outside of that I think that just maybe the O line is ok. I think we have to look at getting another CB- Henry is not looking that great, is 30 NOW, and Glenn has one foot in the grave. And maybe a real BIG MEAN NASTY NT that eats centers and uses their leg bones for toothpicks would be a good one as well.
 
Top