I've said this before...
Funny how when players sign with the Pats, they do so not with the intention of being one of the highest paid at their position, but to win a championship. And yet with this team, it *feels* more "me first" than team first. Perhaps it's because they don't respect our coaching staff, and they figure "if I'm gonna be stuck in Dallas without any chance of a championship, I may as well get paid." Stephen Jones already said he doesn't want to be a trend setter with these type of contracts, and I agree with him.
This whole issue is an NFLPA problem with the rookie contract structure and salary cap. Why the players aren't taking it out on them instead going after the owners is beyond me.
The owners don't have a cash flow problem, they never have. They have a salary cap constraint, and as far as I can tell, it was not self imposed. Jerry did not want this in 1993, after 2 straight SB titles.
Lastly, the players need to take a long hard look at the players union in major league baseball. Look at the sweet deal those guys get. No salary cap. If a player gets let go, the team must still honor the terms of his contract. Boom. If I were both NFL and MLB material, it would be a simple decision as to which path I'd take.