Dak can make history week 1

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
46,580
Reaction score
46,004
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Yeah, you guys like stats more than wins.
The ONLY argument that you can make for Dak is with stats.
Too bad there isn't a stat for choking.
You know- losing and taking your team with you.
There isn’t for a reason. Are you bright enough to grasp?
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,736
Reaction score
3,898
Yeah, I'll take that one:
He's played in the worst division in football and played against weak teams, and then against good teams he chokes and the Cowboys get so far behind that Dak gets his stats by throwing against prevent defenses because they know the game is already won.
It's not that hard to explain; we've all watched it happen.

Tom Brady is the GOAT and played in the weakest division for 20 years and he didn't do this. (Insert your spin job here)

Ok again.... out of tens of thousands of quarterbacks.... according to your logic, Dak is THE ONLY quarterback in NFL history to have been aided by bad teams and never beat good teams correct?

So you're saying out of tens of thousands of quarterbacks in NFL history.... Dak played weaker teams and divisions than all of them right??
 

Walker

Texas Ranger
Messages
4,024
Reaction score
3,548
Sign the man to a contract asap before it gets more expensive
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
61,998
Reaction score
63,125
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
No one with a brain thinks he should. At least before the playoffs.
He passes as well as anyone and as he hits age 30 you don't take shots by running.

He runs it about as well as Rodgers which is the perfect comparison given the OP stat.
Come playoffs you run if you need to.
Wow.

I did not suggest Prescott turn into Lamar Jackson. Instead, I inferred that he should run after plays break down and not take sacks when positive yardage can be made. He has demonstrated that since returning from his ankle injury but not often.
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,736
Reaction score
3,898
Yeah, I'll take that one:
He's played in the worst division in football and played against weak teams, and then against good teams he chokes and the Cowboys get so far behind that Dak gets his stats by throwing against prevent defenses because they know the game is already won.
It's not that hard to explain; we've all watched it happen.

Oh speaking of wins vs good teams....

Dak is 22-25 vs winning teams. That's not great.

But Aaron Rodgers is 41-44-1. As great as Rodgers is, he's also 0-4 vs Jimmy Garoppolo. According to your logic, what should I take from this....

Oh yeah.... Matthew Stafford is 11-72 vs winning teams.


(Insert spin and excuses here)
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,736
Reaction score
3,898
Which will always be 1 more than Dak will ever see.

Trent Dilpher and Nick Foles have one too. So does that mean they are just as good as Rodgers??

Oh wait... surely Eli Manning is a better quarterback than Rodgers because he won 2 rings. Correct?
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,620
Reaction score
16,503
dak has always been king of the stats.
Though it looks like some others will soon pass him and rodgers in this stat.
 

leeblair

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,769
Reaction score
5,965
61-36 career record. A playoff win just last season.

So Dak has good stats AND he wins?

No wonder NFL players, coaches, scouts and execs universally ranked him as a top 10 QB this offseason.

NFL personnel would laugh you out of the room. That can't feel good.
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:
I would laugh most NFL personnel out of the room.
They're all about nepotism and sales, not football.
If you rank Dak as top 10, you're as naive as the people you listen to.
 

leeblair

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,769
Reaction score
5,965
Tom Brady is the GOAT and played in the weakest division for 20 years and he didn't do this. (Insert your spin job here)
Tom Brady didn't choke against good teams; thats the difference. Brady beat the good teams and the bad. Dak just beats the bad, and the Cowboys season ends every year because Dak choked when they needed him to be the reason they got better.
Ok again.... out of tens of thousands of quarterbacks.... according to your logic, Dak is THE ONLY quarterback in NFL history to have been aided by bad teams and never beat good teams correct?

So you're saying out of tens of thousands of quarterbacks in NFL history.... Dak played weaker teams and divisions than all of them right??
I'm saying Dak has cost the Cowboys because he chokes when he should be leading.
We've ALL seen it!
 

GoldenR

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,903
Reaction score
3,024
The only stats I care about are playoffs. 2-4 in the playoffs and the last two years losing to Jimmy G and Purdy. PATHETIC. Also for you statisticians, 20-35, 200 yards, 1 TD 2 picks and a pick 6, QBR 55. 20-55, 250 yards,1TD, 1 pick and QBR of 32. Put your spin on that ! Have a good night.
 

leeblair

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,769
Reaction score
5,965
Oh speaking of wins vs good teams....

Dak is 22-25 vs winning teams. That's not great.

But Aaron Rodgers is 41-44-1. As great as Rodgers is, he's also 0-4 vs Jimmy Garoppolo. According to your logic, what should I take from this....

Oh yeah.... Matthew Stafford is 11-72 vs winning teams.


(Insert spin and excuses here)
Dak's choking is the reason that the Cowboys lost those big games.
He's Jason Garrett 2.0.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,235
Reaction score
13,802
Tom Brady is the GOAT and played in the weakest division for 20 years and he didn't do this. (Insert your spin job here)

Ok again.... out of tens of thousands of quarterbacks.... according to your logic, Dak is THE ONLY quarterback in NFL history to have been aided by bad teams and never beat good teams correct?

So you're saying out of tens of thousands of quarterbacks in NFL history.... Dak played weaker teams and divisions than all of them right??
Take it down a notch with your daily tough guy coward talk, Can you make a point for once without it?

You think Brady would get this when the guy runs in quicksand? More guys will get here the more the league employs guys with legs. Also you think the guys from the 60s-80s would have this. Their stats throwing and running were way below due to offenses

With all that said congrats to Dak. Well deserved. but you don’t have to act like this should have happened with 10000 QBs
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,670
Reaction score
12,381
Prescott should run more. I hope that will happen this season with this West Coast Offense.
Yes. The great Joe Montana - one of the first WC Offense QBs ran a ton. Almost 1676 years in a 14 year career!

Dak will never catch up.
 

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,540
Reaction score
8,146
I'm just waiting for one of the Dak hating cowards to explain, how a "bum", "below average", "trash" quarterback can possibly be only one of two quarterbacks in NFL HISTORY who will accomplish this milestone.

There have been tens of thousands of quarterbacks who have come through this league. So how can such a horrible quarterback like Dak do this????

(The low IQ coward bunch will definitely avoid this question)
They will avoid the question like the plague!!

Plus "Cowboys Fans" prop up other QBs but routinely Hate on Prescott.

Can you imagine if Prescott had never thrown a TD in the 4th Qtrs of ANY of his playoff starts???
 

SoBlue128

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,084
Reaction score
5,903
The only stats I care about are playoffs. 2-4 in the playoffs and the last two years losing to Jimmy G and Purdy. PATHETIC. Also for you statisticians, 20-35, 200 yards, 1 TD 2 picks and a pick 6, QBR 55. 20-55, 250 yards,1TD, 1 pick and QBR of 32. Put your spin on that ! Have a good night.
Which games are those stats from
 
Top