Dak can make history week 1

[SteveTheCowboy]

If Romo had HOF stats, he would be in. The committee doesn't see enough stats to induct Romo. A superbowl win is also a stat. Im not all over the place, you just know what the hell you're talking about.

Catch up son...

"Doesn't see enough stats"?
So....I'm asking you....not the committee.
Romo has the stats and you know it. He just doesn't have the sb.
You just can't admit it fs up your argument.

 

[GINeric]

"Doesn't see enough stats"?
So....I'm asking you....not the committee.
Romo has the stats and you know it. He just doesn't have the sb.
You just can't admit it fs up your argument.

Superbowl wins are a stat.

The HOF committee proves my argument, so no.... my argument isn't *** up....

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

You know what really ruins the board??? When fake *** fans come here and are allowed to make dumb *** statements and claims about players without having to present credible evidence, stats, links or anything to back up their bogus arguments.

Especially when real fans present proof, stats, or evidence that are real life proof that what those haters are spewing doesn't line up with reality.

That's what ruins the board. This place would be alot better if people were held accountable to put real life facts to back up their claims. If people were put in position to have to use intelligence to post.....

Alot of these fake *** fans would leave the board because they aren't capable of making intelligent post without bogus and untrue claims.

You get to decide who is a fan.

Man thats some pompous arrogance.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Superbowl wins are a stat.

The HOF committee proves my argument, so no.... my argument isn't *** up....

Look at those goal posts running away!

 

[GINeric]

We all saw it.
Dak shut down every time the season was on the line and the offense disappeared until the game was out of reach and Dak could pad his stats against prevent defenses.
He couldn't even beat the Eagles third stringers with the division on the line.

I didn't know Dak had to play the Eagles by himself, I've never seen that done before. You got a link?


While you figure that out.... Aaron Rodgers is supposed to be a better quarterback than Jimmy Garoppolo, correct??


Can you explain to me why Aaron Rodgers is 0-4 vs Jimmy Garoppolo?? If im using YOUR logic, that means Garoppolo is a MUCH better quarterback than Rodgers, correct?

 

[BoyzBlaster]

Calling something meaningless that no one cares about "history" is pretty generous.

 

[leeblair]

I didn't know Dak had to play the Eagles by himself, I've never seen that done before. You got a link?


While you figure that out.... Aaron Rodgers is supposed to be a better quarterback than Jimmy Garoppolo, correct??


Can you explain to me why Aaron Rodgers is 0-4 vs Jimmy Garoppolo?? If im using YOUR logic, that means Garoppolo is a MUCH better quarterback than Rodgers, correct?

You just don't want to see it. Or maybe you see it but want to argue about it to make yourself feel better.
But there is no doubt that Dak has shut down in big games and that has cost the Cowboys.
Every year.
It's a team game, but the team is handicapped by Dak.

 

[GMO415]

 

[GINeric]

You just don't want to see it. Or maybe you see it but want to argue about it to make yourself feel better.
But there is no doubt that Dak has shut down in big games and that has cost the Cowboys.
Every year.
It's a team game, but the team is handicapped by Dak.

Ok, Dak shuts down if you say so.

Like I said, Rodgers is 0-4 vs Jimmy Garoppolo. So this has to mean that Garoppolo is better than Aaron Rodgers, correct??

Can you explain why Rodgers can't beat Garoppolo??

 

[Darkhound]

if you guys have guts to admit... and a sense of reality... DAK can throw for 90k yards and it will not matter.
DAK is an AVERAGE, MEDIOCRE QB that plays for a ONCE TOP NOTCH franchise that has been MEDIOCRE for more than 25 years.
Any fan, aficionado etc who thinks otherwise is a plain fool

 

[leeblair]

Ok, Dak shuts down if you say so.

Like I said, Rodgers is 0-4 vs Jimmy Garoppolo. So this has to mean that Garoppolo is better than Aaron Rodgers, correct??

Can you explain why Rodgers can't beat Garoppolo??

That is a different subject, and the teams are different. But I'd be willing to guess that Rodgers has held his team back because of his ego. Rogers has had good coaches, but he seems discontented all the time- even going to the Jets now.
When a player can dictate who the coach is, that is always a problem.

 

[nobody]

Cool! I hope he gets it!

 

[GINeric]

That is a different subject, and the teams are different. But I'd be willing to guess that Rodgers has held his team back because of his ego. Rogers has had good coaches, but he seems discontented all the time- even going to the Jets now.
When a player can dictate who the coach is, that is always a problem.

See... its a different subject for others, yet Dak is held accountable for "who HE beat". Cmon bro.

 

[coult44]

1st in.

Good deal, maybe he can put it beside his super bowl ring.

Care to tell any of us what profession you spend time in?