Yeah, but interestingly enough, this thread was made to claim that Dak can't win without certain perfect or ideal situations and circumstances around him. And yet the same ones who will always ridicule Dak by claiming he needs to be "carried" or can't win under certain ideal NFL situations or circumstances. have so often defended the QBs that they like/favor (Romo, Rodgers, Wentz, Stafford etc..) by saying or implying that it's unfair to ask these QBs to be able to achieve or accomplishment certain key NFL QB feats, without having the "perfect team" around them. Or they say that these QBs shouldn't be expected to win or achieve certain things, when the situation or game circumstance around them isn't perfect or ideal.
Yet still will judge, ridicule, and criticize Dak based off of them saying he can't win or accomplish certain NFL QB feats without a good team around him or without the situation they call "perfect" for Dak to be in. Yet they'll defend QBs they favor, when they struggle on a bad team or a team with injuries and say that these QBs should be given a break, if they aren't on a good enough team to prove their talents.
Whether it be Super Bowl wins, having consistent winning seasons, or some other Key NFL NFL feat, they always defend and excuse their favorites with "It's not really fair to ask or expect *insert QB* to have accomplished *insert blank*, when *insert blank* team or NFL situation, wasn't perfect, difficult or ideal for him."
It's just the double standards and the different set of rules they make for Dak, in which find hypocritical and makes me believe that this Dak hate goes way overboard at times.