JBS
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,559
- Reaction score
- 22,205
Well it means something. So far Aaron Rodgers record sans Fat Mike is 0 Super Bowls. Perhaps Fat Mike wasn't the problem.
Oh yeah..he only is about to win the MVP wo that loser.
Well it means something. So far Aaron Rodgers record sans Fat Mike is 0 Super Bowls. Perhaps Fat Mike wasn't the problem.
Oh yeah..he only is about to win the MVP wo that loser.
You're 100% right....There are some CZ members that think posting perposterous subject matter for conversations \ threads is entertaining.
But it really is just abusing the privilege provided by this fan site.
Big whoop. Ask Brady and Mahomes if they prefer to go to the SB or win the MVP.
Winning the nfl MVP means nothing.
In the grand scheme of things, no it really does not mean anything. It's an award saying you played great. What's the point in that if you miss out on the biggest prize? It's the same as getting selected to the Pro-Bowl and your season is over in December.
Hahahahahahaha
Fat Mike has never won anything including a division title without Rodgers....He has problems winning a game without Rodgers. Rodgers has gone 26 and 6 without Fat Mike the past two years. What is Fat Mikes record again.,Rodgers has never won anything without Fat Mike.
This place never ceases to entertain me.Perfect situation for both
call them trolls daddy. surprise themThis place never ceases to entertain me.
I bet you wouldn’t call him Fat Mike to his face.Fat Mike has never won anything including a division title without Rodgers....He has problems winning a game without Rodgers. Rodgers has gone 26 and 6 without Fat Mike the past two years. What is Fat Mikes record again.,
why? would he try to eat you.I bet you wouldn’t call him Fat Mike to his face.
I bet you wouldn’t call him Fat Mike to his face.
lol my bad Raiders Umm ok either way 3 teams in CA 2 of which would scoop him up in a heartbeat..rams are the 3rd one but not sure what cap hit they would have to take to replace Goff..Just want to point out that there is no longer an NFL team in Oakland.
right first off you dont like being challenged, simply learn to read off of a quoted post i included in the reply..
secondly they said that about manning and brady.. right 37 MVP regulars season and lost by score to TB..clueless fans who think daks the only option and only player dallas should consider even though he wants far more then hes worth.. rogers can easily play 3 more years at level better then dak..period..its worth a debate that for sure and migt be worth a real consideration by dallas although i believe GB would not trade to Dallas more like out of NFC if they could have the finial say. rumors are a CA team as its his true home towns so SF and Oakland only options he would consider. it takes 3 to tango and GB and AR have the first two votes and again i doubt Dallas would eve be in the mix and an NFC team unlikely..
sort of the way Farve was handled..they made him take the jets before he came back to the nfc..
Aaron Rodgers know thank you. Mr. Hail Mary media lover boy. He’s another one that needs to complete team to win anything. I’ll Take Stafford firstwhy would you not trade Rogers for dak? hes better then dak even at his age he has plenty left to get 2-3 seasons out of him..no way the packers trade him in the NFC especially the DC and no need for Luv..this is no brainier straight up trade if we were a QB away and dak is unwilling to sign a fair team friendly deal..the money is nearly even so dak or rogers the next 3 seasons?
hes our manning we just need to fix the defense enough..
again not happening but fun to debate...