PA Cowboy Fan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,354
- Reaction score
- 51,350
What I find funny is people trying to discredit what Dak did last year because he is in a slump this year.
Due for a slump?.......when was Romos 3 game slump? Too funny
I almost forgot about those games. That's when we couldn't post a winning record in December.2006: Lost 42-17 to the Saints, two weeks later threw for just 142 yards in a 23-7 loss to the Eagles. Went 1-3 that December.
2007: Went 13/36 passing against the Eagles, lost to Washington in the finale, went 18/36 against the Giants in the playoffs with an endzone pick.
2008: Closed the season with two losses, including a 44-6 thumping in the finale at the Eagles.
Now, Romo's numbers were generally better than Dak's were in most of these games, but to think Prescott was going to keep putting up superb games week after week just based off his rookie year is being unrealistic.
At some point, Dak was going to look bad. Here it is. This is my point.
Film on him isn't the problemIf only he could be a rookie again and remove all the film on him.
You pick the weirdest hills to get on, man.
Dak has a lot of good qualities...
One of them to overcome the doubters. I think he's playing like crap. But I also think he'll get past it.
2010Due for a slump?.......when was Romos 3 game slump? Too funny
Film on him isn't the problem
Film isn't the reason he's overthrown open receivers
Film is the reason he's passed up Beasley underneath and tried to make bigger plays on the outside
Lazy and shallow thinking on your part
He certainly has the right mentality, an excellent work ethic, and natural leadership ability. That's three "its" I can think of.
What he does not have, at least not yet, is the ability to overcome sub-par line play, horrible receiver play, and predictable playcalling from his coaches.
Dak has to be a lot better, but he's also a scapegoat at the moment. This team's problems run far deeper than a struggling sophomore quarterback.
I believe the condensed definition of “it” is: the ability to hand off to a 1st team All Pro RB and throw 5 yard passes to a wide open Witten/Beasley behind the protection of three 1st team All-Pro OL while playing a rotten schedule featuring 1-15, 2-14 and 3-13 teams.
I believe the condensed definition of “it” is: the ability to hand off to a 1st team All Pro RB and throw 5 yard passes to a wide open Witten/Beasley behind the protection of three 1st team All-Pro OL while playing a rotten schedule featuring 1-15, 2-14 and 3-13 teams.
Come on now. He went into Pittsburgh and Green Bay last year, two places where the home teams rarely lose, and made some huge throws in pressure packed situations.
2010
24-23 from 2011-13. Romoites bragging about that stretch?
I hope they come up with a vaccine for it.That's all we heard from everybody for about 15 months. Can someone tell me what "It" is? Thank you.
I don't think he was bad against AtlantaWe will find out if he has "It.
He is three games into six.
And it is not looking good.
At all.
Outside of the bomb to Dez in Pit, not really. Zeke was the crucial element of both games. That and Rodgers being in a major funk (by his standards).
I don't think he was bad against Atlanta
I thought he was quite good
Sometimes your best just isn't good enough
Best I've ever seen him look. First half anyway
Poised, under control, made the right reads, nothing was there. What can you do!
My opinion
That's all we heard from everybody for about 15 months. Can someone tell me what "It" is? Thank you.