Dak is 27 yards away from passing Roger Staubach

[Established1971]

They had a play clock in the NFL back then.

sorry, not true, not when staubach began

 

[Runwildboys]

So...you are saying...if anyone believes Roger is the better QB of his day.....it makes them triggered and a dak hater.

I just love the YOU...got pre triggered. Epic.

C'mon, he's only referring to the people who get overly emotional at the thought that someone might imply that Dak is better than Roger.

 

[Runwildboys]

How is the all time passing list for the cowboys a stupid stat?

It's not so much "stupid" as irrelevant, because of the way the game has changed.

 

[Captain-Crash]

dak is the best ever, past and future.

 

[Runwildboys]

The past usually dictates the future.

Only when the participants behave similarly. So far, this team has been defying historical precedence.

 

[terra]

Only when the participants behave similarly. So far, this team has been defying historical precedence.

so far....

Its the playoffs that will tell the tale.

 

[Runwildboys]

From where I sit it appears that the Cowboys won the last two games kin spite of Dak. If Detroit doesn't fumble at the goal line they probably win that game.
Against the Bears the entire team rolled.
Both were games the Cowboys were supposed to win. No surprise there.
I love seeing the Cowboys win. That's why I want Dak to prove himself over the next six games. No excuses.

So they won against Chicago in spite of Dak leading them to three TDs in the first half?

 

[DUO_CORE]

27 more yards until a SB victory?

 

[Captain-Crash]

even if he never wins crap, he's the best ever. I love me some stats.

 

[AyeAtey]

Roger would have been like Mahomes in today's NFL.

Or Allen, but not really.

 

[Runwildboys]

so far....

Its the playoffs that will tell the tale.

That's why I said "so far".

 

[shabazz]

It's not so much "stupid" as irrelevant, because of the way the game has changed.

One can only imagine what kind of yards Dan Marino would have put up in todays NFL

 

[diamonddelts]

no clearer indication of how one QB racks up playoff wins and SBs and the other racks up empty stats

Antonio Ramiro Romo has entered the chat.

 

[Captain-Crash]

You clearly put more stock into stats over winning meaningful games.

7th best loser in team history. not bad. only two guys won it all.

 

[shabazz]

Antonio Ramiro Romo has entered the chat.

Nude

 

[leeblair]

So they won against Chicago in spite of Dak leading them to three TDs in the first half?

The Cowboys had the momentum during the entire game- which we expected. Dak does great during games like that, and thats fine. He's always played well in those situations. Everyone was making plays. The run game led the Cowboys offense.
But even at that he threw an interception that hurt the Cowboys in the first half.
He does okay against weaker teams.

 

[PA Cowboy Fan]

The Cowboys had the momentum during the entire game- which we expected. Dak does great during games like that, and thats fine. He's always played well in those situations. Everyone was making plays. The run game led the Cowboys offense.
But even at that he threw an interception that hurt the Cowboys in the first half.
He does okay against weaker teams.

I 'm glad he played well last week but i want to see him do that in the playoffs against a good team.

 

[Runwildboys]

The Cowboys had the momentum during the entire game- which we expected. Dak does great during games like that, and thats fine. He's always played well in those situations. Everyone was making plays. The run game led the Cowboys offense.
But even at that he threw an interception that hurt the Cowboys in the first half.
He does okay against weaker teams.

Then why did you say they won in spite of Dak? I see Dak for what he is, which is very good when he's on, and pretty bad when he's not. He's been inconsistent, but when he has a good game, it's wrong to claim they won in spite of him.

 

[Nav22]

I will give you this: you are consistent with your emotionally driven, irrelevant, childish posts.

LOL, softest "vet" ever.

"WAAAH why are Cowboys fans posting about Dak Prescott!?!?"

 

[leeblair]

Then why did you say they won in spite of Dak? I see Dak for what he is, which is very good when he's on, and pretty bad when he's not. He's been inconsistent, but when he has a good game, it's wrong to claim they won in spite of him.

Because in my opinion he's the weak link on the Cowboys chain.
The Cowboys don't win because of Dak.
They win in spite of him. When they need him to be the difference that makes them better, he doesn't.
And that's why they can't beat good teams.