Dak is nearly on an elite pace against winning teams!

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,487
Reaction score
76,336
By empty stats do you mean that they dont mean anything if your coach, defense and special teams suck?

I definitely agree.
They can't make their mind up.They spent all year saying Garrett sucks before they realized saying he sucks was actually helping Dak out in arguments...so now they completely ignore and pretend like Garrett wasn't a issue.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
They can't make their mind up.They spent all year saying Garrett sucks before they realized saying he sucks was actually helping Dak out in arguments...so now they completely ignore and pretend like Garrett wasn't a issue.

They say Dak was the main problem, yet the entire coaching staff got fired and the defense is the major focus of the offseason. LOL

How dumb to they sound cutting up a guy that lead the #1 offense in the NFL, scored over 27 points a game average, and came 1 yard shy of breaking the Cowboys all time passing record?

Mindless trolls.
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
20,109
Reaction score
16,594
What narrative? LOL

I don't bring up W/L records until YOUR side does. Don't attempt to push the narrative onto me, boy. I criticize his play

Against Green Bay - garbage
Against Philly in the second game - garbage
Against the Bills - garbage
Against the Patriots - garbage

He had ONE impressive game last year and that was against the Vikings. That's it.

He was garbage vs GB?

He had two picks bounce off WRs hands, one was a walk-in TD and the defense was garbage most of the game.

Dak threw for 463 yards, real garbage performance.

This is why it is hard to take Dak haters seriously, you guys think everything is black and white and are totally unrealistic.
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,798
Reaction score
20,655
He was garbage vs GB?

He had two picks bounce off WRs hands, one was a walk-in TD and the defense was garbage most of the game.

Dak threw for 463 yards, real garbage performance.

This is why it is hard to take Dak haters seriously, you guys think everything is black and white and are totally unrealistic.

He had 3 INTs that helped put us in a hole

But I'm glad he got yards when the game was practically out of reach.
 

Quickdraw

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,084
Reaction score
1,775
I get sick and tired of people forcing a narrative on this forum using their jaded feelings and their proverbial expert eye test. Facts are the facts up to this point regarding Dak, so let me preface my post by saying that I'm only providing factual evidence to crush the idiotic narratives that exist against our well deserving and about to be "PAID" franchise quarterback Dak Prescott.

From day 1 I've been one of his biggest fans, and I agree maybe to a fault at times, but for those of you that keep beating the drum that Dak can't win against good teams please enlighten me here a little bit. I will post the facts down below. All I'm saying is lots of guys whom aren't even on Dak's level in regards to winning percentage against good teams got paid so why not Dak? I mean, lets be frank here, Dak is on an elite pace against good teams, the numbers don't lie!

dak2.jpg

dak1.jpg
You really can't compare by just the numbers without breaking down games lost and why. Were those games lost during a time when the game didn't matter? Were injuries involved? Were the refs involved. There are many different reasons that aren't spelled out by a flat comparison
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,487
Reaction score
76,336
He was garbage vs GB?

He had two picks bounce off WRs hands, one was a walk-in TD and the defense was garbage most of the game.

Dak threw for 463 yards, real garbage performance.

This is why it is hard to take Dak haters seriously, you guys think everything is black and white and are totally unrealistic.
And that's my issue on it and a lot of topics on this site. Everything is black and white to them. So annoying to get into a debate and when you bring up explanations its called "excuses". But there are reasons for things. There are reasons for why we went 8-8 last year.
 

johneric8

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,242
Reaction score
3,222
You really can't compare by just the numbers without breaking down games lost and why. Were those games lost during a time when the game didn't matter? Were injuries involved? Were the refs involved. There are many different reasons that aren't spelled out by a flat comparison

Why not? Then why is okay for a bunch of Dak haters on the forum to constantly say that Dak cant win against good teams? This is what I've been reading from many of you for last 6 months!
By saying that, they're basing it on an off year for our team last season where we not only beat a couple of good teams but lost to some good and bad ones. As far as I'm concerned if some guy can claim that his "Betty Davis Eyes" show him that Dak isn't the answer I can certainly post FACTS and STATS that prove otherwise.

Did you ever stop to think that the stats I posted effect all Qb's the same? Does it really matter what their stats were passing wise? Bottom line Dak's record over his career show he has a pretty good win percentage against winning teams when compared to some of the elite. When you compare him to guys like Wentz, David Carr, ETC his percentage is way better. I know what you're going to say, you're going to say that well Dak had better teams! This isn't an appropriate retort because if you're going to blame Dak for most of the loses you have to give him credit when the team wins..
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,798
Reaction score
20,655
Yea god forbid you ask a $100 million WR to catch a ball that hits him in the hands.

And a soon to be $40 mil a year QB should be able to throw it to a WR in stride and not lob a ball into the middle of the field and pray.
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,477
Reaction score
32,237
LOL.........so is your analysis the better Dak plays the more it's his fault?

Surely you arent that dumb?

Clearly you lack an understanding of the team concept.
I don’t hold my breath when Dak throws. Now Romo in the other hand. Almost suffocated many times
 

ondaedg

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,891
Reaction score
3,034
You mean because he continues to throw behind his WRs?



Whose fault was this at 3:08?



That ball was on Cooper's left shoulder. Amari even admitted that he should have caught it. Throwing behind the wr is one of Dak's weaknesses though.
 

ondaedg

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,891
Reaction score
3,034
Loved Romo, but when we got down by the GL I was holding my breath.

He was a gunslinger. I hated the INTs where the receivers broke the route one way and Romo threw to the other. About half of his picks were him and the WR being on the wrong page. To #ell with those option routes that Garrett used!
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,798
Reaction score
20,655
That ball was on Cooper's left shoulder. Amari even admitted that he should have caught it. Throwing behind the wr is one of Dak's weaknesses though.

Dak also said it was a poor throw. So who are you going to believe? I said right when it happened, it's a combination of poor accuracy and bad hands. Running full speed and needing to almost stop to adjust and catch a fast ball is hard at any level, Dak needed to put that ball in stride and that is possibly a TD.

Either way, 0 points going into the third quarter with only 3 points nearing the 4th. The offense sucked and Dak nearly got picked off 4 times if it wasn't for King dropping a ball that went directly to him.
 

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
They know these threads were made, they are pretending to not know. Why? Because they most likely participated in those threads.
Thank you pointing out that I was not making them up. If they can’t remember the threads, they are either senile or telling a lie so that they don’t look so bad.
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,798
Reaction score
20,655
Thank you pointing out that I was not making them up. If they can’t remember the threads, they are either senile or telling a lie so that they don’t look so bad.

Yep, I remember specifically them calling Tom Brady a "game manager" and how he wasn't very good until like 2007. They ignored the fact that Brady was top 10 or even top 5 in major categories nearly every single season before then. His first year as a full starter, he led the league in TD passes. He was great from the jump and always had the clutch gene.

This wouldn't even be a knock on Dak, only Joe Montana is comparable to Brady. But they just had to make the comparison.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
He was garbage vs GB?

He had two picks bounce off WRs hands, one was a walk-in TD and the defense was garbage most of the game.

Dak threw for 463 yards, real garbage performance.

This is why it is hard to take Dak haters seriously, you guys think everything is black and white and are totally unrealistic.

463 yards doesn't count because we were coming from behind. LOL
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Yep, I remember specifically them calling Tom Brady a "game manager" and how he wasn't very good until like 2007. They ignored the fact that Brady was top 10 or even top 5 in major categories nearly every single season before then. His first year as a full starter, he led the league in TD passes. He was great from the jump and always had the clutch gene.

This wouldn't even be a knock on Dak, only Joe Montana is comparable to Brady. But they just had to make the comparison.

So you are crying because Dak isnt Tom Brady or Montana?

Just a random question. How many SB's does Brady win if Garrett is the HC and not Belli?

How many SB's does Montana win if Garrett is the HC and not Bill Walsh?
 
Top