Dak is the man

[NumOneQB]

Dak's playing great.

I still haven't seen him win a game Tony would have lost, though. And I still think Tony wins the NY game if he were healthy.

It's a great position to be in as a Cowboys fan.

Tony would've thrown several INT's by now. That alone changes the course of several games.

 

[plymkr]

He just keeps winning games.

I find that cheap and meaningless..

He would be so much better if he were setting passing records and getting all kinds of numbers.

Stats are what matter.

Lol, funny

 

[Idgit]

Tony would've thrown several INT's by now. That alone changes the course of several games.

Lol. He'd have several more tds, too. No way the Skins or Bears or Bengals or 49ers beat a Romo led team.

 

[THEHEREAFTER]

I kept telling everyone... we need more data and the qb situation would explain itself.

 

[percyhoward]

Stats are what matter.

Like he doesn't have them.

 

[NumOneQB]

Lol. He'd have several more tds, too. No way the Skins or Bears or Bengals or 49ers beat a Romo led team.

Strong words.
Well, I say no way Romo gets through that many games without going back on IR.

 

[Jack Burton]

Dak's playing great.

I still haven't seen him win a game Tony would have lost, though. And I still think Tony wins the NY game if he were healthy.

It's a great position to be in as a Cowboys fan.

Do you think Dak would win the NY game now? He seems to be improving every week, and was super sharp for the majority of this game.

 

[Sarek]

Lol. He'd have several more tds, too. No way the Skins or Bears or Bengals or 49ers beat a Romo led team.

Romo's coming back because Jerry cant resist then you will be proven wrong, it happens to all of us at one time or another.

 

[THEHEREAFTER]

Lol. He'd have several more tds, too. No way the Skins or Bears or Bengals or 49ers beat a Romo led team.

The game is not played on paper. Not saying Tony wouldn't be 5-0 but to say insert Tony's experience and skill and add 20 points to every game is not wise. I've seen us up games (GB 26-3 a few years back) and you can just feel the nervousness in the crowd. As skilled as he his, he also has the knack for the bizzare insane play that changes momentum. Anyways... this isn't really a Tony day. It's a day to be proud of where this team is right now.

 

[PA Cowboy Fan]

Do you think Dak would win the NY game now? He seems to be improving every week, and was super sharp for the majority of this game.

Should have won the NY game anyway. A couple TD passes were dropped.

 

[GoJacks]

Tony would've thrown several INT's by now. That alone changes the course of several games.

That's just dumb.

 

[NumOneQB]

The staff is clueless if Dak gets benched. Jerry needs to loosen that damn glue on his hairpiece and get a clue....

 

[Tenkamenin]

Dak's playing great.

I still haven't seen him win a game Tony would have lost, though. And I still think Tony wins the NY game if he were healthy.

It's a great position to be in as a Cowboys fan.

Who knows what game Tony would've won or lost, I don't know how that could be determined. What we do know is that our Rookie QB is playing mistake free football and is leading our team to TDs and not field goals.

 

[GoJacks]

The game is not played on paper. Not saying Tony wouldn't be 5-0 but to say insert Tony's experience and skill and add 20 points to every game is not wise. I've seen us up games (GB 26-3 a few years back) and you can just feel the nervousness in the crowd. As skilled as he his, he also has the knack for the bizzare insane play that changes momentum. Anyways... this isn't really a Tony day. It's a day to be proud of where this team is right now.

The Cowboys didn't have the line and running game they have this year. I'm not knocking Prescott, and I am excited to have him as the future QB of the Cowboys, but when Romo is healthy, he gives the best chance to win now.

I think the wins have blinded some people to the accuracy issues Prescott has. Don't get me wrong, I fully believe he is the Cowboys QB of the future, he could just use a little time.

 

[SuspectCorner]

Dak is ridiculously good. I'm sorry, but there is no more logical case in starting Tony over him, IMO. The future is now.

Only that Romo is one of the all-time greatest passers to have ever played the game. Yep, no logic at all.

 

[Sarge]

It really would make no sense to take Dak out at this point. .02

 

[Air Force One]

Who knows what game Tony would've won or lost, I don't know how that could be determined. What we do know is that our Rookie QB is playing mistake free football and is leading our team to TDs and not field goals.

Exactly ....perfectly said. You have to remember though: there are some on this board that don't care about winning as much as who is QB, regardless of wins and losses.

 

[PA Cowboy Fan]

Exactly ....perfectly said. You have to remember though: there are some on this board that don't care about winning as much as who is QB, regardless of wins and losses.

It's loyalty to Tony. I can understand it but football is a brutal business. No telling what Tony we're going to get back. Big risk to mess with what we have going now.

 

[SDCowboy]

Only that Romo is one of the all-time greatest passers to have ever played the game. Yep, no logic at all.

By that tired logic, Joe Montana should still be playing...

 

[Jack Burton]

Should have won the NY game anyway. A couple TD passes were dropped.

I agree with this. I think he played good enough to win, but he struggled a bit as the game wore on. I think he's improved enough that he'd convert more in the second half and the Boys would get out with a win. It is absolutely awesome to not be forced to trot out the likes of the Weedster and Casmell. Having a good young QB is a beautiful thing.