Dak now has a worse playoff record than Tony Romo

[lsg13]

There's "Win & Move on Games" and there's been "Win & Get in Games". The slate for Romo comparison is excluding the "Win & Get in Games" like a set of mere trivial momenta. Yes Dak has been bad leading this team to greener pasttures.....but gosh.....there are portions of Romo legacy becoming like CRT, erasable.

they aren't the same... like it or not, a win to get in game means you really aren't that good of a team so losing can be expected... making the playoffs at 12-5 should mean you are a very good team and losing, especially in the first round, should not be expected.

It's sad that the Dak homers are now resorting to the "Romo" excuse for defending his bad play... It doesn't really matter what Romo did, that's in the past, Dak is the present and future, that's what matters now and it's not looking good.

 

[DandyDon1722]

I disagree it’s worse. Romo couldn’t even get to the playoffs 5 times

2-5>2-4

It's MUCH WORSE. Romo never had the type of talent this team has, especially on defense. ARomo has 8 TD' 2 INTS with a 93 QB Rating in the playoffs. He was never the reason we lost playoff games. Even in '07 we had two dropped TD passes and he absolutely got robbed in Green Bay on the Dez catch.

No - Dak is much...much...worse.

 

[PA Cowboy Fan]

 

[loublue22]

worse than baker mayfield as well

 

[Captain-Crash]

sweet another record for dak. "get that money"

 

[Cmac]

they aren't the same... like it or not, a win to get in game means you really aren't that good of a team so losing can be expected... making the playoffs at 12-5 should mean you are a very good team and losing, especially in the first round, should not be expected.

It's sad that the Dak homers are now resorting to the "Romo" excuse for defending his bad play... It doesn't really matter what Romo did, that's in the past, Dak is the present and future, that's what matters now and it's not looking good.

 

[Cmac]

they aren't the same... like it or not, a win to get in game means you really aren't that good of a team so losing can be expected... making the playoffs at 12-5 should mean you are a very good team and losing, especially in the first round, should not be expected.

It's sad that the Dak homers are now resorting to the "Romo" excuse for defending his bad play... It doesn't really matter what Romo did, that's in the past, Dak is the present and future, that's what matters now and it's not looking good.

I got it. And that's fair enough if you prefer the difference in "big games". Fair enough. Couldn't agree more that Dak has to stand on his own legacy, and it be acknowledged from us fans. Fully understand.

But for the record........CRT on this board, from me........means Critical Romo Theory (CRT). We will erase it from Cowboy History and make sure there is no recollections or mention of those specific moments that weren't favorable.

 

[Irvin88_4life]

None of Romo's playoff loses saw the Cowboys being beaten like a red headed step-child.

Vikings?

 

[Redline360]

It's MUCH WORSE. Romo never had the type of talent this team has, especially on defense. ARomo has 8 TD' 2 INTS with a 93 QB Rating in the playoffs. He was never the reason we lost playoff games. Even in '07 we had two dropped TD passes and he absolutely got robbed in Green Bay on the Dez catch.

No - Dak is much...much...worse.

Romo had some head scratching moments in in the playoffs(Seattle)but he was far from the problem. Dez catch, rb fumble, crayton giving up on a certain wide open TD plus his huge drop for first down which argurbly could have been a TD or easy 40+ yard gain.

His worse game by far was against the vikings. Entire team got embarrassed. The 06 team was barely a playoff team to begin with.

Dak has had the superior team on both sides of the ball(someone posted statics in another thread).

 

[shabazz]

It's MUCH WORSE. Romo never had the type of talent this team has, especially on defense. ARomo has 8 TD' 2 INTS with a 93 QB Rating in the playoffs. He was never the reason we lost playoff games. Even in '07 we had two dropped TD passes and he absolutely got robbed in Green Bay on the Dez catch.

No - Dak is much...much...worse.

There is no doubt that Romo wouldn't have been 11-21 for 86 yards and no tds at that point of the first half.

No freakin way

He may have had a pick but he would have hung at least 14 on them easily in the half