Like I said, everyone sees through you. You are polite and nice to the pro-dak crowd. You call people Idiots, get caught lying in threads, say people are in the DDS Cult when it is someone who isn't in the pro-dak camp. I've seen other people point this out before too. If you are truly neutral and argue in good faith then you would treat both sides the same since there are extremist on each side. Year 11, no closer to to being what we need if we ever do get to the playoffs, and instead like the pro-dak camp you want everyone to focus in on the coaching, defense, etc.
Yes we know those are worse than Dak, but as was brought up way back many years ago, you can fix those and then the offensive line needs replacing, the receivers, that is how Jerry builds teams. That was true under Romo as it is with Dak. Thats been true for a long time, that the quarterback, the leader of the team has to make do with what bad GMing surrounds him with, especially if you pay him a big percentage of the Cap. Last year the narrative was, oh you surround the QB with an average defense, improve the running game, and he will do alright in the playoffs. So the GM worked on improving the defense; it is what it is.
But my gripe was, again, even if we do make it to the playoffs, this quarterback has shown signs that he doesn't handle pressure well and makes bad decisions in the first three games. And again, it was my plan not to post about Dak this week, but you go rehashing things from old threads. I mean I haven't changed my opinion.
