Whiskey Cowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,413
- Reaction score
- 3,201
You're imagining things. I loved Tony and I love Dak. I've supported Dak every year he's been in Dallas. The playoff game broke my heart, but that isn't relevant to the conversation. The reality of it is that the game has evolved, and will continue to evolve. Spread offenses have made their way into the league and officials are cracking down on defenses, leading to higher scoring, "more entertaining" games. The direct result of that is an uptick in passing yards, passing touchdowns, completion percentages, and quarterback rating.You exposed yourself by comparing Dak's to Romo's eras and stating Romo played under a more dangerous game. You Romoholics are the worst.
Look at the numbers for the leading passers in the 90s, 00s, 10s, and 20s, and tell me honestly that you believe my take is wrong. I grew up with Aikman. He's the standard I tend to hold Dallas QBs to. Not Tony, and not Dak. His numbers are absolutely miniscule, compared to the leading passers in the modern era, yet his legacy was that of an elite passer, a leader, and a winner. Why is that? Is it because the game has changed and passers are given more opportunity to complete passes? Yes. That's my argument. Stop trying to save face by focusing on one sentence.