QBR has only been around maybe 8-9 years so I don't know if that should even be included. But the rest of this post got me curious so I looked it up..
in 2004 Testaverde threw 17 TDs and 20 INTs and was 26th in passer rating..
In 2005 Bledsoe was 17th in passer rating with 23 TDs and 17 INTs.
In 2006 Romo was 15th in passer rating with 19 TDs and 13 INTs. After this Romo settled in on a nice run of generally being around the top 10 in most categories. And occasionally entered the top 5.
So basically these three and Dak have been the only "true starting QBs" the Cowboys have had. And I dare say if nothing else changes this season by Dak will be better than any of these. I guess you could also throw 2010 Kitna in there he finished 14th in passer rating with 16 TD and 12 INTs .. Again.. certainly inferior to where Dak is right now.
Great stuff. Thanks for looking it up.
I usually use total td and turnovers, so rushing tds and fumbles are included.
Dak is a plus 6 right now, thanks in part to him reducing his fumbles.
Anyway, looks like he's certainly ahead of 2004 and I would predict he'll be ahead of 2005, though I'm not sure where Bledsoe's +6 differential ranked that year. I think differentials and passer ratings have gone up over time, so where they ranked in the year they played (so vs current year peers) is important.
I'm guessing a plus 6 ranked much higher back then than it does now.
I wouldn't use anyone that didn't play at least half the games, and really 10 or more is probably more valid.
So we agree on that too.
As for Kitna, he fell into the backup playing due to injury in my mind. Kind of like Dalton in 2019 and others in 2015. I'm guessing his differential is even lower than that +4 because I recall him losing some fumbles but not scoring rushing TDs.
Thanks again
4 games left. Dak will improve.