MountaineerCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 29,059
- Reaction score
- 71,273
I don’t know what routes they were supposed to run. I don’t have a playbook. Do you?So the receivers didnt run wrong routes?
I don’t know what routes they were supposed to run. I don’t have a playbook. Do you?So the receivers didnt run wrong routes?
Why is this guy allowed to troll day after day after day???I don’t know what routes they were supposed to run. I don’t have a playbook. Do you?
@modsWhy is this guy allowed to troll day after day after day???
All he does is run into a Dak thread and start ridiculing Dak nonstop while riling up the masses so the thread can be shut down. That's his game.
I didn't take it like that. I can see where his haters would. They are the same fans that hate on him when he shoulders the blame. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.This the kinda players you like, Ranch?
The blame everyone else types?
Trolling is against the rules.@mods
Questioning the mods is not allowed.
Your example is not a correct interpretation of site rule #1.@mods
Questioning the mods is not allowed.
But that would imply that all the years in Moore's system they couldn't figure out where to be, when & why.What he said was more of an indictment on Moore's system, not the receivers themselves.
Well he's only had one year that was really bad on INTs and easily a third of them were of the hit the receiver in the hands/face/chest variety.. so yeah.. kinda makes sense. It also makes sense to assume that since it had never happened before it isn't likely to happen again.So he basically threw his wide receivers under the bus for the previous years.
So if you dont know the play/routes. How can you say without a doubt the mis-timed/INT's was solely because of Dak?I don’t know what routes they were supposed to run. I don’t have a playbook. Do you?
So if you dont know the play/routes. How can you say without a doubt the mis-timed/INT's was solely because of Dak?
The same way that you can blame the receivers and the OC.So if you dont know the play/routes. How can you say without a doubt the mis-timed/INT's was solely because of Dak?
Honestly, I don't see how it can be misinterpreted.well, as expected people will read into it, what they want. perhaps this was about tipped by the defender...as in routes that would put the defenders in the passing lane......tip the pass
There have been tons of articles written about the route concepts. I'm not sure why there are so many that ignore it.No explanation needed when its in Dak's original quote:
"They know where the hell to be, why to be and when they’re getting looked at."
If a playbook is too convoluted for a player to get the timing right every single time, something needs to change. Mis-timed routes leads to tips and INT's.
I can name two INTs, the one Ferguson had hit him in the chest and bounce in the air and the one Brown had hit him in the hands against Jacksonville that were perfect throws, hit the receiver right where the ball needed to be that turned into INTs ... Most of Dak's INTs had nothing to do with triple coverage. Several of them were of the receiver not crossing the safety's face variety which speaks to somebody being on the wrong page. The ones right before half against Detroit and Chicago on almost the same play for instance. I can't definitively say who missed that read but none of those were into triple coverage either. Well maybe the one to CD in Green Bay but that was only because Schultz ran the wrong route and brought his man over. Then there was the one to Sweat against Philly which was just a simple miscalculation of the guy's hops. And of course the INTs on back to back plays where the DB dropped the first one and some idiot called the same play to make sure to let him catch it the second time. Oh and the one to Gilmore when Gallup fell on his cut? I could go on and on but you won't acknowledge it anyway. Yes Dak threw some INTs that were into coverage. However very few of them were into triple coverage. MAYBE 2 or 3.. but that's about it.Perhaps not throwing into triple coverage will cut down on those “tips”…….
A little bit, but I took it more of a dig on Moore. Its like Moores offense was too confusing or open to too many options they werent on the same page. THIS offense is more well defined and MM is going a better job of making sure everyone knows where and why to be.So he basically threw his wide receivers under the bus for the previous years.
You called him out for insults then called him a clown......You don't watch because you're a troll. Period. All you want to do is ridicule and insult while sounding like a clown.
It didnt suck by any stretch, but there was something missing. It didnt have that extra gear or variety against better defenses. Didnt have that creativity. Moore didnt have that 6th sense IT factor.Yeah that 2nd most productive offense behind the Chiefs sucked.
Cooper Rush didn’t have these “tipped INT” issues.A little bit, but I took it more of a dig on Moore. Its like Moores offense was too confusing or open to too many options they werent on the same page. THIS offense is more well defined and MM is going a better job of making sure everyone knows where and why to be.