Dallas Cowboys 2009 Outlook: A Rebuilding Year?

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
Dallas Cowboys 2009 Outlook: A Rebuilding Year?
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1794410/dallas_cowboys_2009_outlook.html?cat=14
By Jon Stall

A Rebuilding Year?

Coming off a 13-3 finish and their first NFC East title since 1996, the Dallas Cowboy 2008 season opened amidst great expectations. Hopes were high in spite of their disappointing first round loss to the Giants in the playoffs. However, in the immortal words of Dickens, what was expected to be the "best of times" ended as the "worst of times" with the underachieving Cowboys finishing a disappointing 9-7 and a failure to make the playoffs.

Silver and blue faithful unlike last season will more likely greet the 2009 campaign, featuring the team's debut in the brand new, state of the art, $1 billion Cowboy Stadium, with feelings more akin to cautious optimism. Expectations this year are tempered by the off season moves made by the team that seem to herald a new commitment to youth as the team showed a number of proven veterans the door in favor of promoting younger players to the starting line up. Whether the off season decisions represented a change of philosophy by Cowboy owner Jerry Jones and a willingness to concede this season to a rebuilding year in hopes of garnering greater success in the future or was simply a cost cutting measure as some have speculated, remains rather murky at present. Yet without any doubt, it is clear that the Cowboys will have to do more with less (talent) in 2009 if they expect to improve on last year's disappointing finish. Gone from the team roster are the likes of Terrell Owens, WR; Pacman Jones, CB; Anthony Henry, CB (16 game starter in 2008), 11 year veteran Greg Ellis, OLB and veteran safety Roy Williams. In most respects, the Cowboys will be looking to a group of young, unproven, albeit talented players with little NFL experience, to step up and fill some pretty large shoes left by the departing veterans.

Last year Dallas had what was for the most part, a respectable defense, finishing 20th in the league in scoring defense, 12th in rushing defense and 5th in passing defense. At least early on until the younger players have the chance to settle into their new starting roles, defense which bore the brunt of personnel changes, threatens to be a glaring weakness. It isn't all gloom and doom in the Lone Star state however, as the Cowboy offense could improve over last season, especially if Quarterback Tony Romo is able to shake off last year's lackluster performance and return to his 2007 season form and someone steps up in the receiving corps to provide a legitimate deep threat.

Can Dallas pick up the pieces and put together a credible run at a conference championship and the playoffs this year? As a life-long Cowboy fan since the days of Don Meredith and Tom Landry, I certainly hope so. Yet while the Cowboys may have a lot of the talented pieces needed to be successful in 2009, one has to wonder if they have them all.

Offense

The Dallas offense in 2008 lacked both consistency and efficiency finishing the season with a 22 point per game average (18th in the league) and just over 107 yards per game rushing average (21st in the league). Boasting what is arguably the deepest running back corps in the NFL with Marion Barber, Felix Jones, and Tashard Choice, I look for the Cowboy running game to improve in 2009, which should in theory result in a more robust passing game. Yet which version of Tony Romo reports for duty along with the unanswered questions at wide receiver will have a great impact on offensive productivity. Strength returns in 2009 in the form of what is still one of the best offensive lines in the NFL and in the form of stalwart Jason Witten at TE. Newcomer John Phillips, also at TE, advertised as sure handed, a good blocker and experienced on special teams is a promising addition on the offensive side of the ball.

Dallas traded away Terrell Owens, who despite the drama and distractions he creates wherever he goes, was still one of the most potent and productive receivers in the league and leaves perhaps the biggest shoes to fill. The other Roy Williams, Patrick Clayton, Sam Hurd and Miles Austin are the receivers that will have to make the Dallas passing game go this year, all of who locally are not highly regarded. Still I feel optimistic that this group can get the job done. In years past, Cowboy teams have been able to achieve good success in the passing game with journeymen type receivers. With only a handful of notable exceptions, Dallas has rarely had super star caliber players at the wide receiver position.

Defense

The departure of Greg Ellis and very nearly the entire secondary along with an inexperienced, unproven cast at inside linebacker combine to make the defense the biggest question mark for Dallas this season. Ask any Cowboy fan what their biggest fear concerning the team's defense is, and almost every one of them will say it's the secondary. The Cowboys gave up both talent and experience in dealing away both Pacman Jones and veteran Anthony Henry. CB Terrance Newman returns as the only defender in the secondary with significant experience. How the young Cowboy secondary plays will potentially make or break the 2009 season.

Historically linebackers have been a strength for Dallas but this is another unknown in 2009. Anthony Spencer will replace veteran Greg Ellis at one of the OLB spots and standout DeMarcus Ware returns to fill the other. Youth and inexperience will be the rule for the inside linebacker positions as well as with regard to depth at all linebacker positions.

The defensive line should be solid despite some new faces there as well. In comparison to the secondary and linebacker positions, the defensive line is the least area of concern.

The Cowboy secondary has struggled in recent years and while on the surface it seems little has been done to improve this area of weakness the Cowboy faithful are hopeful that someone like DeAngelo Smith or Mike Mickens will step up and surprise.

This is a season where success or failure for the Dallas Cowboys hinges on whether a talented but largely inexperienced group of players are able to take the next step. Feeling cautiously optimistic that they are, after getting off to a rough start I expect the team to get better as the season progresses and predict they will finish the year at 8-8. While I expect 2009 to be a second consecutive year that Dallas will miss the playoffs, with lowered expectations perhaps the Cowboys have a chance to impress their fans by overachieving for a change rather than being a team that is expected to do big things but that in the recent past has always seemed to fall short of those expectations.
 

dadymat

I'm kind of a Big Deal
Messages
6,023
Reaction score
1
Gryphon;2801091 said:
Dallas Cowboys 2009 Outlook: A Rebuilding Year?
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1794410/dallas_cowboys_2009_outlook.html?cat=14
By Jon Stall

A Rebuilding Year?

Coming off a 13-3 finish and their first NFC East title since 1996, the Dallas Cowboy 2008 season opened amidst great expectations. Hopes were high in spite of their disappointing first round loss to the Giants in the playoffs. However, in the immortal words of Dickens, what was expected to be the "best of times" ended as the "worst of times" with the underachieving Cowboys finishing a disappointing 9-7 and a failure to make the playoffs.

Silver and blue faithful unlike last season will more likely greet the 2009 campaign, featuring the team's debut in the brand new, state of the art, $1 billion Cowboy Stadium, with feelings more akin to cautious optimism. Expectations this year are tempered by the off season moves made by the team that seem to herald a new commitment to youth as the team showed a number of proven veterans the door in favor of promoting younger players to the starting line up. Whether the off season decisions represented a change of philosophy by Cowboy owner Jerry Jones and a willingness to concede this season to a rebuilding year in hopes of garnering greater success in the future or was simply a cost cutting measure as some have speculated, remains rather murky at present. Yet without any doubt, it is clear that the Cowboys will have to do more with less (talent) in 2009 if they expect to improve on last year's disappointing finish. Gone from the team roster are the likes of Terrell Owens, WR; Pacman Jones, CB; Anthony Henry, CB (16 game starter in 2008), 11 year veteran Greg Ellis, OLB and veteran safety Roy Williams. In most respects, the Cowboys will be looking to a group of young, unproven, albeit talented players with little NFL experience, to step up and fill some pretty large shoes left by the departing veterans.

Last year Dallas had what was for the most part, a respectable defense, finishing 20th in the league in scoring defense, 12th in rushing defense and 5th in passing defense. At least early on until the younger players have the chance to settle into their new starting roles, defense which bore the brunt of personnel changes, threatens to be a glaring weakness. It isn't all gloom and doom in the Lone Star state however, as the Cowboy offense could improve over last season, especially if Quarterback Tony Romo is able to shake off last year's lackluster performance and return to his 2007 season form and someone steps up in the receiving corps to provide a legitimate deep threat.

Can Dallas pick up the pieces and put together a credible run at a conference championship and the playoffs this year? As a life-long Cowboy fan since the days of Don Meredith and Tom Landry, I certainly hope so. Yet while the Cowboys may have a lot of the talented pieces needed to be successful in 2009, one has to wonder if they have them all.

Offense

The Dallas offense in 2008 lacked both consistency and efficiency finishing the season with a 22 point per game average (18th in the league) and just over 107 yards per game rushing average (21st in the league). Boasting what is arguably the deepest running back corps in the NFL with Marion Barber, Felix Jones, and Tashard Choice, I look for the Cowboy running game to improve in 2009, which should in theory result in a more robust passing game. Yet which version of Tony Romo reports for duty along with the unanswered questions at wide receiver will have a great impact on offensive productivity. Strength returns in 2009 in the form of what is still one of the best offensive lines in the NFL and in the form of stalwart Jason Witten at TE. Newcomer John Phillips, also at TE, advertised as sure handed, a good blocker and experienced on special teams is a promising addition on the offensive side of the ball.

Dallas traded away Terrell Owens, who despite the drama and distractions he creates wherever he goes, was still one of the most potent and productive receivers in the league and leaves perhaps the biggest shoes to fill. The other Roy Williams, Patrick Clayton, Sam Hurd and Miles Austin are the receivers that will have to make the Dallas passing game go this year, all of who locally are not highly regarded. Still I feel optimistic that this group can get the job done. In years past, Cowboy teams have been able to achieve good success in the passing game with journeymen type receivers. With only a handful of notable exceptions, Dallas has rarely had super star caliber players at the wide receiver position.

Defense

The departure of Greg Ellis and very nearly the entire secondary along with an inexperienced, unproven cast at inside linebacker combine to make the defense the biggest question mark for Dallas this season. Ask any Cowboy fan what their biggest fear concerning the team's defense is, and almost every one of them will say it's the secondary. The Cowboys gave up both talent and experience in dealing away both Pacman Jones and veteran Anthony Henry. CB Terrance Newman returns as the only defender in the secondary with significant experience. How the young Cowboy secondary plays will potentially make or break the 2009 season.

Historically linebackers have been a strength for Dallas but this is another unknown in 2009. Anthony Spencer will replace veteran Greg Ellis at one of the OLB spots and standout DeMarcus Ware returns to fill the other. Youth and inexperience will be the rule for the inside linebacker positions as well as with regard to depth at all linebacker positions.

The defensive line should be solid despite some new faces there as well. In comparison to the secondary and linebacker positions, the defensive line is the least area of concern.

The Cowboy secondary has struggled in recent years and while on the surface it seems little has been done to improve this area of weakness the Cowboy faithful are hopeful that someone like DeAngelo Smith or Mike Mickens will step up and surprise.

This is a season where success or failure for the Dallas Cowboys hinges on whether a talented but largely inexperienced group of players are able to take the next step. Feeling cautiously optimistic that they are, after getting off to a rough start I expect the team to get better as the season progresses and predict they will finish the year at 8-8. While I expect 2009 to be a second consecutive year that Dallas will miss the playoffs, with lowered expectations perhaps the Cowboys have a chance to impress their fans by overachieving for a change rather than being a team that is expected to do big things but that in the recent past has always seemed to fall short of those expectations.


this guy Fails.............

for one we didnt trade T.O......we cut him...:muttley:

and i dont think secondary is most fans biggest fear ..

also i believe that Hamlin has a bit of experience as well
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
And what are this clowns credentials to even be able to discuss stadium parking?

Henry was done and that was fairly clear. Scandrick and Jenkins played well and Sensebaugh by anyones measure is better then what we had last year. Roy Williams is a pro bowl WR. TO is clearly past his peak. Ellis was also not a standout anymore (like he ever was). Brookings is if anything a upgrade from Zack.

I could go on but it would be like using a sledgehammer to drive a thumb tack.
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
dadymat;2801141 said:
this guy Fails.............

for one we didnt trade T.O......we cut him...:muttley:

and i dont think secondary is most fans biggest fear ..

also i believe that Hamlin has a bit of experience as well

burmafrd;2801259 said:
And what are this clowns credentials to even be able to discuss stadium parking?

Henry was done and that was fairly clear. Scandrick and Jenkins played well and Sensebaugh by anyones measure is better then what we had last year. Roy Williams is a pro bowl WR. TO is clearly past his peak. Ellis was also not a standout anymore (like he ever was). Brookings is if anything a upgrade from Zack.

I could go on but it would be like using a sledgehammer to drive a thumb tack.

how is owens past his peak?
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
He can no longer break free from pressure as he once could. Look at his stats and you will see that he had one or two big games and the rest were below average even when Romo was in the game. He reminds me of Emmitt after 2000 or so- he can still get up for the big games but no longer has the tools to dominate steadily.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,883
Reaction score
112,853
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Gryphon;2801091 said:
Ask any Cowboy fan what their biggest fear concerning the team's defense is, and almost every one of them will say it's the secondary.
I don't think that is true at all and I don't think most in here would agree with that either.

I would be much more concerned if we had kept A. Henry and R. Williams.
 

interestedobserver

New Member
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
I think this team is in the mix for the division with the Eagles and Giants. The Commanders are probably a tick behind. I have no idea what to expect this year. I think the Giants and Philly are good for tens wins a piece. Dallas, 9, and Commanders 8 as a best guess, but who knows?

Let's put it this way. 500 is as good as anybody can hope to do in the division. That means to get to ten wins requires going 7-3 out of the division against a decently hard schedule. I don't know if the boys can do that.
 

NeonNinja

Dash28
Messages
17,294
Reaction score
15,038
interestedobserver;2801324 said:
I think this team is in the mix for the division with the Eagles and Giants. The Commanders are probably a tick behind. I have no idea what to expect this year. I think the Giants and Philly are good for tens wins a piece. Dallas, 9, and Commanders 8 as a best guess, but who knows?

Let's put it this way. 500 is as good as anybody can hope to do in the division. That means to get to ten wins requires going 7-3 out of the division against a decently hard schedule. I don't know if the boys can do that.
I don't know if your Gnats can do that.
 

Fletch

To The Moon
Messages
18,395
Reaction score
14,042
Stopped reading after we traded T.O. :rolleyes:

Could care less if this was a typo. You should really proof read before hitting send.

Bottom-line, speculation is a *****!
 

RoadRunner

New Member
Messages
2,809
Reaction score
0
Dash28;2801301 said:
This shows your uninformed or not very intelligent.


He's right, it was only 8 interceptions despite 60 sacks. Haven't you ever heard the old saying that a fierce pass rush generates interceptions? Well, not in our case. The fact that our secondary only totaled 8 picks despite a pass rush that generated 60 sacks indicates that our secondary in 2008 was downrignt pathetic.

Not only the lack of picks, but how about that overall tackling by our secondary? From Jenkins' "business decision" to not try to tackle a guy, to Newmann giving up on a second consecutive 75+ yard run by the Ravens, 2008's secondary was one of the worst in team history.
 

NeonNinja

Dash28
Messages
17,294
Reaction score
15,038
RoadRunner;2801375 said:
He's right, it was only 8 interceptions despite 60 sacks. Haven't you ever heard the old saying that a fierce pass rush generates interceptions? Well, not in our case. The fact that our secondary only totaled 8 picks despite a pass rush that generated 60 sacks indicates that our secondary in 2008 was downrignt pathetic.

Not only the lack of picks, but how about that overall tackling by our secondary? From Jenkins' "business decision" to not try to tackle a guy, to Newmann giving up on a second consecutive 75+ yard run by the Ravens, 2008's secondary was one of the worst in team history.
No, he stated that it was the same secondary. No Pac, Henry or Roy, far from the same secondary.
 

silverbear

Semi-Official Loose Cannon
Messages
24,195
Reaction score
25
DaBoys4Life;2801258 said:
the same secondary with 8 ints last year?

No... gone are Anthony Henry, PacMan Jones, Roy Williams... in are Gerald Sensabaugh (who Jags fans seemed to think was the team's best defensive player down the stretch last year), some rookies (Mickens, Mike Hamlin, and DeAngelo Smith), and a coupla second year players who are expected to step up (Jenkins and Scandrick)...

And you call that "the same secondary"?? There are likely to be no fewer than 4 regular contributors in that secondary, or roughly half of them...

I'm curious, do you work hard at being obtuse, or does it come naturally to you??
 

silverbear

Semi-Official Loose Cannon
Messages
24,195
Reaction score
25
Dash28;2801301 said:
This shows your uninformed or not very intelligent.

DaBoys just revels in being the quintessential cynic, or resident ****... nobody takes his relentless gloom and doom bleating seriously...
 

silverbear

Semi-Official Loose Cannon
Messages
24,195
Reaction score
25
RoadRunner;2801375 said:
He's right, it was only 8 interceptions despite 60 sacks.

And yet, the Boys ranked 5th in pass defense... it would appear that the only thing they didn't do particularly well was pick off passes...

2008's secondary was one of the worst in team history.

Yeah, 5th in the NFL is AWFUL... but hey, that's OK, now I know to add you to the list of posters who really don't know what they're talking about... it's a depressingly long list, but it's helpful when you try to separate the wheat from the chaff...

From this point forward, I know that you fall squarely into the "chaff" category...
 

RoadRunner

New Member
Messages
2,809
Reaction score
0
And how many 3rd & 10+ were given up by this secondary as well?

Are you guys happy with how they played in 2008? I am not. I expect more from professional players than give ups, and underachievement. I expect guys to tackle, I expect picks when the pass rush is in the QB's face all day, I expect better than a 9-7 fail to make the playoffs performance, but I guess that makes me "uninformed". Some of you guys need to be honest with yourselves a little more often. It is not a crime to point out areas of deficiency on the team and expect better.
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
burmafrd;2801289 said:
He can no longer break free from pressure as he once could. Look at his stats and you will see that he had one or two big games and the rest were below average even when Romo was in the game. He reminds me of Emmitt after 2000 or so- he can still get up for the big games but no longer has the tools to dominate steadily.

if you say so but i think the lack of numbers by TO is more of a failure by garrett for numerous reasons.

silverbear;2801397 said:
No... gone are Anthony Henry, PacMan Jones, Roy Williams... in are Gerald Sensabaugh (who Jags fans seemed to think was the team's best defensive player down the stretch last year), some rookies (Mickens, Mike Hamlin, and DeAngelo Smith), and a coupla second year players who are expected to step up (Jenkins and Scandrick)...

And you call that "the same secondary"?? There are likely to be no fewer than 4 regular contributors in that secondary, or roughly half of them...

I'm curious, do you work hard at being obtuse, or does it come naturally to you??

we still have the same core Sas before or did jenkins and scandrick not get any playing time? As for the rest of them this is a show me league and they aint show me **** yet.

as for me being a "cynic" excuse me but maybe it's cause i'm tired of the hype without anything to sure for it. Each year it's the same **** it''s time to put up. We got all this flash but no substance. New stadium overpaid OC some reality show mega super star QB and for what to get bounced from the playoffs or not make it? IDC for fan favorite players last year if someone from another board saw some of the comments bout amendola they would of sworn he was our #1 WR.

As for us being fifth our secondary was still toast didn't force turnovers and continued to uive up big play after big play.
 

silverbear

Semi-Official Loose Cannon
Messages
24,195
Reaction score
25
RoadRunner;2801407 said:
And how many 3rd & 10+ were given up by this secondary as well?

Well, their pass defense ranked 11th in the league in 3rd down conversion percentage allowed, at 32.1 per cent, so I'd guess not all that many...

It is not a crime to point out areas of deficiency on the team and expect better.

It's not a crime, but it's rather STUPID to say the pass defense was bad because of the low number of ints (and it's IDIOTIC to suggest, as you did, that "2008's secondary was one of the worst in team history.)... all that means is their DBs have stone hands... but they were middle of the pack when it comes to completion percentage allowed (14th), 5th in yards allowed, tied for 8th in yards per attempt allowed, tied for 10th in fewest TD passes allowed, 5th in fewest completions of 20 yards or more allowed (again suggesting they didn't give up near as many completions on 3rd and 10 plus as you claim), and tied for 13th in fewest completions of 40 yards or more...

All of those numbers are mediocre to good... I'm not saying their pass defense was great, and I'm not saying there's not room for improvement-- the Boys apparently drafted DBs this year in part based on their making numerous ints in college-- I'm just saying it's stupid to claim that "2008's secondary was one of the worst in team history.", just because they only had 8 picks... by that standard, the Cards had a FAR better pass defense, they had 13 picks... but they also gave up 36 TD passes, while the Boys gave up just 19... the Cards gave up 221.2 yards per game, the Cowboys gave up 187.7 yards per game, nearly 35 yards per game less... the Cards allowed opposing QBs to put up a 96.9 rating, the Boys allowed an 86.2 rating... so who really had the better pass defense??

Then there's the Pats... they had 14 ints to the Cowboys' 8... they also gave up 27 TD passes to the Cowboys 19, allowed 204.4 yards per game to the Boys' 187.7, and allowed an 89.8 average quarterback rating versus the Boys' 86.2...

Next up, the Jaguars... they had 13 ints to the Boys' 8... they also gave up 25 TD passes to the Cowboys' 19, allowed 224.1 yards per game to the Cowboys' 187.7, and allowed an average quarterback rating of 95.4 to the Cowboys' 86.2...

There's three teams for you, all of whom had more ints than the Cowboys did, which by your definition means they were better pass defenses... but only a stone MORON would look at all the numbers and come to that conclusion...

I repeat once again, all the Cowboys' low int numbers tells us is that their DBs couldn't catch a cold... but that's not all there is to playing defensive back in the NFL... and the Boys seem to have addressed that deficiency by drafting Mickens (14 ints in his college career), Smith (12 career ints) and Michael Hamlin (14 ints)... that's 3 DBs who combined for 40 interceptions in their college days, suggesting their hands are somewhat better than the returning Boys' DBs...

So once again, your knee-jerk rage doesn't impress me as being particularly knowledgeable about the game of football...
 
Top