supercowboy8;4903592 said:
Sorry but your wrong with everything just said.
What exactly was wrong? That Baltimore uses Ngata like a NT? That 3-4 DEs are usually taken later than NTs? Or the same argument against NTs could be made against guards, because all 3 of those are true
supercowboy8;4903592 said:
Also im not for drafting a OG early in round one, I want a game changer.
Considering that we would pick 20th if the dratf order was set today, I don't think we'll be picking anyone early in round 1 unless we trade up.
supercowboy8;4903592 said:
If one isnt there then trade back. I would take a NT in a trade back but not where we are picking.
Getting cute and trading back would be a mistake. Whether we want a NT, G or some other position, as long as the value matches, take them.
supercowboy8;4903592 said:
Also a top OG can make a bigger difference for this team than a NT where we are picking or in a trade back.
Based on what? A top NT would completely change the way RRyan calls this defense almost ithout any other additions. It would free up Lee & Carter a lot more as well as force more 3rd and Longs where we could actually rush more than 3 guys. A top guard doesn't change as much considering we still need a new center and right tackle.
supercowboy8;4903592 said:
All I'm saying is, if you cant get a for sure great NT then you can get a top OG.
I'm for taking the best available guy at a number of positions, NT, G, T, DE, S, doesn't matter (although safety is a long shot). If they are #1 take them. However this draft has many quality NTs and Gs, so based on numbers I think it will be one or the other.
supercowboy8;4903592 said:
Look at the history of the draft. NTs have a much bigger bust rating over OGs do.
Yea, G is a safe pick, like I bet FB is too. Kickers and Punters that go in round 1 have a very low bust rate too.