mcmvp
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,339
- Reaction score
- 2,290
Lol…good lord.Then don’t look in the mirror so often.
Lol…good lord.Then don’t look in the mirror so often.
Lol…good lord.
Summed up perfect.If Dak can somehow figure out his issue with the post snap read especially in the Playoffs this team wins a championship or 2. If he doesn’t well he will be just another wasted talent at QB.
I get the jist of what you are conveying.If Dak can somehow figure out his issue with the post snap read especially in the Playoffs this team wins a championship or 2. If he doesn’t well he will be just another wasted talent at QB.
Absolutely live in a different world than you. That’s quite obvious.You really live in a different world, don’t you?
Just exactly what did I begin? Who created this thread of ridiculous data….Was it me or you?
After 8 seasons, do you really think he can figure it out? Not being argumentative in either direction, I just think he's hit his ceiling.If Dak can somehow figure out his issue with the post snap read especially in the Playoffs this team wins a championship or 2. If he doesn’t well he will be just another wasted talent at QB.
I’ve said earlier in this thread that if he hasn’t in year 8-9 I’m not sure if he will. I’m under no illusions here. But if we really want to pinpoint his issue this is it and it’s what’s holding him back. He’s openly stated that he’s struggled with it as recently as the GB game, and there is video evidence going back to the first SF playoff game that confirms it. This is when he gets that “look”.After 8 seasons, do you really think he can figure it out? Not being argumentative, I just think he's hit his ceiling.
Dilfer did not lead his team to a SB. He was the definition of a bus driver that leaned on the #1 defense that year and one of the strongest Ds among the NFL across seasons. Foles played well enough to not cost his team, but it’s still arguable that he led that team or was clutch.Can you please answer the original question? Since Dilpher and Foles led their teams to Superbowl victories and Marino and Kelly didn't..... according to the logic used, Dilpher and Foles are obviously more clutch than Marino and Kelly, correct??
I know it's hard, but can you avoid deflecting, ducking and dodging the question this time? Is that too difficult to answer or something??
It's not an excuse but a reality. It's low tier to compare players from different eras of any sport. The way football was played in late 80's and 90's is way different today, plus the average player is bigger and more athletic.Oh wow.... the different era excuse. No disrespect to you per say, but they don't get that excuse. If Dak and any other quarterback is judged by a standard, they ALL are judged by the same standards.
Dilfer did not lead his team to a SB. He was the definition of a bus driver that leaned on the #1 defense that year and one of the strongest Ds among the NFL across seasons. Foles played well enough to not cost his team, but it’s still arguable that he led that team or was clutch.
Kelly would be considered a choker by many on this forum, and even elsewhere.
So your professional opinion is that Dak sucks right?It's not an excuse but a reality. It's low tier to compare players from different eras of any sport. The way football was played in late 80's and 90's is way different today, plus the average player is bigger and more athletic.
No but you're setting up your window aka time frame with the draft. Unless you find a gem like Brady or Mahomes it's all about that window. Get the ground work done with your draftees and when you think you have a shot at the title you go all in and fill the needed roster spots with good free agents or trades (and yes that means trading away future 1st etc). Then you have two or three years and see how it goes. If it doesn't work out you trade away all the trade potential and start over.Really think that in today's drafting competition there are enough fuure hall of famers to stock up on in a couple drafts to maneuver that movement with?