I have no idea which QB would perform better because we judge them by the offenses they run, the plays called for them, the field position their defense affords them. Why can’t they both be very good young QBs still improving?
I will say this. There are very few franchise QBs in the NFL, and any team without one, along with many teams that brought one in that’s been unsuccessful, would all line up to sign Dak if he were free. If anyone wants to deny that fact and continue the false line that “Dak sucks” cannot be taken seriously.
The same fans that think our head coach and offense is terrible and want the whole staff fired and replaced actually think Wentz would be more successful in Dallas than Dak would be in Philly where he’d have a “genius” head coach and play caller? Imagine Dak playing in that offense of pick plays, crossing routes, a huge receiver like Alshon and those two star TEs. Then imagine Wentz playing two years with the receivers Dak had early in his career and today with Witten as his only TE.
Sorry, but you can’t have it both ways to always blame everything on coaches, play-calling, and the offense, yet also think another QB would make the difference. That argument is when you see a fan’s ulterior motive.
Dak and Wentz are both young franchise QBs who can win games. More than half the teams in the NFL would love to have either one.