maryquality
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,958
- Reaction score
- 15,721
But wouldn't they rather have K. Moore?
Well right....even a "we are going to do our best to get one of them" wouldn't be good enough for me.Nobody can ‘guarantee’ him either guy.
umm the first ones were via digital means, technically its the first in person so not the same and hes on short list all coming in for their face to face now that they are available..calm down means nothing until it does.
THEY SHOULD ALREADY BE INTERVIEWING FOR A NEW DChope they do it fast if they do hire quinn so cowboys can promote whitt or go after fangio or martindale before they all go some where else
There is one way of that makes sense, if they're thinking of trading for Russell Wilson.I just don't understand the fit for Denver. Happy for DQ but going from a great defensive minded coach to another great defensive minded coach doesn't make sense.
But wouldn't they rather have K. Moore?
Thats horse face Elway for ya!I just don't understand the fit for Denver. Happy for DQ but going from a great defensive minded coach to another great defensive minded coach doesn't make sense.
NO if DQ isnt gone, hes got lie 3-4 interviews none in stone. he may stay. we don't need one can promote within unless that falls through.THEY SHOULD ALREADY BE INTERVIEWING FOR A NEW DC
I just don't understand the fit for Denver. Happy for DQ but going from a great defensive minded coach to another great defensive minded coach doesn't make sense.
I never understood this philosophy. So a team should hire a coach based on their currant weakness at the time? So what if they hire an offensive minded coach and the defense becomes their weakness? Should they go back and fourth like that? Hiring and firing coaches based on their currant weaknesses? Perhaps Fangio is bad at other things (leadership, team management, delegation etc…) that they believe Quinn excels in. It shouldn't matter a coaches speciality.
Yeah, he gone.