iceberg;1322561 said:but what if that record was his best in 4 years?
you tend to leave out little details that seem to deflate the point of cheesy sarcasm.
CanadianCowboysFan;1322887 said:Didn't Parcells go 10-6 in his first year?
iceberg;1322561 said:but what if that record was his best in 4 years?
you tend to leave out little details that seem to deflate the point of cheesy sarcasm.
arglebargle;1322937 said:While I respect Dan Reeves the man, and the player; he was the coach who had John Elway, and couldn't figure a way to play to his strengths. If anything, he was more hidebound than Parcells.
Aikbach;1322620 said:Dan always provides a short lived surge that goes the way of his defected heart.
The previously 5-11 NY Giants went 11-5 in 1993 and an OT away from taking the division from the eventual Team of the 90s. Then he took the 1998 Falcons who were 7-9 the year before to a 14-2 record they had no business having and defeated the best team in the league in Minnesota before succumbing to his former quarterback in the Super Bowl. (long sentence)
He has these bursts of greatness but it will be surrounded by years of crap, are you prepared to take that?
Eddie;1326133 said:Hmmm, lemme think about that one? Short burst of greatness and years of crap, vs 11 years without a playoff win. Hmmm, I think I'll take door #1.
TDHND;1322548 said:He's mentioned that he'd like to coach again. Thoughts?