- Messages
- 102,745
- Reaction score
- 115,243
We have at least one CB I can think of who could keep him company.jswalker1981;2060170 said:I'm thinking Austin doesn't feel so well after today.
We have at least one CB I can think of who could keep him company.jswalker1981;2060170 said:I'm thinking Austin doesn't feel so well after today.
cleverusername;2059765 said:•At the Indianapolis Scouting Combine, Wes Welker’s 40-yard dash time was 1.7 seconds. When scouts double-checked their stopwatches, they saw it had shrunk to 0.7 seconds. They then brought the data to NASA to see if such a speed was humanly possible. NASA said yes, it’s possible, if you’re Wes Welker. NASA then officially petitioned the government to change our unit of time from “seconds” to “Welkers.” This prompted Hollywood to change popular movie titles to Gone in 60 Welkers, Thirty Welkers Over Tokyo, and the Italian classic Trenta Welkeri D’amore (Thirty Welkers of Love)
•If you play defensive back in the N.F.L. and you wake up on Monday morning, it’s because Wes Welker spared your life.
•Wes Welker once ran so fast that he went back in t
ime and lined up against Ronnie Lott, Dick “Night Train” Lane, Mel Blount, Mel Renfro, Willie Brown
j/k fastest combine time was 4.6 but he was the " product of a system"
jdub2k4;2060251 said:He doesn't need yo have the ability to take it to the house every time he touches the ball. All he needs is to get open, catch the ball, and extend the drives...something that we ended up lacking from anyone not named Owens. I really like this kid and hope he turns into a star.
cleverusername;2059765 said:•At the Indianapolis Scouting Combine, Wes Welker’s 40-yard dash time was 1.7 seconds. When scouts double-checked their stopwatches, they saw it had shrunk to 0.7 seconds. They then brought the data to NASA to see if such a speed was humanly possible. NASA said yes, it’s possible, if you’re Wes Welker. NASA then officially petitioned the government to change our unit of time from “seconds” to “Welkers.” This prompted Hollywood to change popular movie titles to Gone in 60 Welkers, Thirty Welkers Over Tokyo, and the Italian classic Trenta Welkeri D’amore (Thirty Welkers of Love)
•If you play defensive back in the N.F.L. and you wake up on Monday morning, it’s because Wes Welker spared your life.
•Wes Welker once ran so fast that he went back in t
ime and lined up against Ronnie Lott, Dick “Night Train” Lane, Mel Blount, Mel Renfro, Willie Brown
j/k fastest combine time was 4.6 but he was the " product of a system"
Thehoofbite;2059681 said:lets say this guy can show enough to make the roster.....what curret WR is in trouble?
I think Hurd.
mperfection;2060325 said:Here's the reality of this sujbect:
Barring injury and/or a major (negative) change in his attitude, this kid IS going to be very productive as a slot receiver for some team in the NFL that has the smarts to use him correctly.
Anybody who doesn't see that this kid has the raw tools and tenacity to become a good receiver just can't spot talent. Period. Why is it that we are so quick to write him off because he is still raw as a receiver?
Amendola has "it"! Hopefully we will be patient and let him develop "it". I would be leery of cutting him and trying to sneak him on to the PS, just like I KNEW that we would lose QB Matt Moore from '07 if we cut him. As raw as Matt Moore was last year as a rookie, from the moment I watched him in the preseason game against the Colts I knew that he had "IT" - he just needed time for development.
Please - let's give Amendola time.
TEUFELI;2060351 said:I guess 32 teams passing on him thru 7 rds means that nobody but you gets that he has "it!" This might be the most homer post I have ever seen. The guy may be servicable, but I am think that you might be his older brother or something.
Bleu Star;2060360 said:I must be related to him too because I am very impressed with what I saw in that video. Distant cousins or something... He appears more than capable of making it in this league and I hope it's with us. The guy is like Welker reincarnated.
mperfection;2060325 said:Here's the reality of this sujbect:
Barring injury and/or a major (negative) change in his attitude, this kid IS going to be very productive as a slot receiver for some team in the NFL that has the smarts to use him correctly.
Anybody who doesn't see that this kid has the raw tools and tenacity to become a good receiver just can't spot talent. Period. Why is it that we are so quick to write him off because he is still raw as a receiver?
Amendola has "it"! Hopefully we will be patient and let him develop "it". I would be leery of cutting him and trying to sneak him on to the PS, just like I KNEW that we would lose QB Matt Moore from '07 if we cut him. As raw as Matt Moore was last year as a rookie, from the moment I watched him in the preseason game against the Colts I knew that he had "IT" - he just needed time for development.
Please - let's give Amendola time.
TEUFELI;2060351 said:I guess 32 teams passing on him thru 7 rds means that nobody but you gets that he has "it!" This might be the most homer post I have ever seen. The guy may be servicable, but I am think that you might be his older brother or something.
Eskimo;2060376 said:Cutting Matt Moore to add the likes of Oglesby and Rogers to the team was a boneheaded decision - just awful.