Darrell Jackson

We can do better. He'd be a 4th WR here at best, would stunt the growth of Stanback, Hurd, and Miles, and I'd rather get a true #2 guy.
 
If we were going to pick up a FA WR, I think we would've already done it. Jackson couldn't even make a difference with the whiners, so I don't see him coming here. But, stranger things have happened.
 
Hostile;1999442 said:
We can do better. He'd be a 4th WR here at best, would stunt the growth of Stanback, Hurd, and Miles, and I'd rather get a true #2 guy.

what he said

David
 
The 49ers are WR starved and he couldn't even avoid being cut? Tells me everything I need to know.
 
I'd stay away from him. It was odd that the Seahawks traded him to the Niners because he was pretty good in 2006 and they are divisional rivals and everybody thought the Niners fleeced the Seahawks. Now the Niners released him after only one year, showing that the Seahawks knew something about him that nobody else did and the Niners wound up finding this out as well.




YAKUZA
 
Bob Sacamano;1999860 said:
he might be damaged goods

Yeah, as much as anything else. Decent deep threat. But he is perpetually injured. They drafted some young WRs and added Bruce. Makes sense to move on..

Pass...
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,781
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top