speedkilz88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 36,950
- Reaction score
- 23,098
Could the hesitations be the plays that he was looking for the first down in short yardage plays? No mention of those first downs.
What does this thread even have to do with Randle? I didn't mention Randle once. I have said in every Randle thread that he needed to be better as well. I also said numerous times, I didn't think we had a feature back on the roster. Essentially, Randle is the lesser of all evils. If you're drawing parallels and looking for an agenda, you may need a mirror.
We can all hope McFadden isn't the guy he was in Oakland. I have just as much hope about that as anyone. I am just being realistic. Yes, it is a tiny sample size but, at this point it's the only sample we have. If I am going to draw conclusions, which is pretty much what a message board is for, then that all I have to go on.
Could the hesitations be the plays that he was looking for the first down in short yardage plays? No mention of those first downs.
DMC had 7 carries in the preseason and 6 carries in the opener. Drawing conclusions at this point is..... pointless.
Good stuff you did your homework. I think DMac will get better with this offense in time. He has what it takes he just never had an offense like this. He'll see these replays too and realize he needs to improve.
I for one think we are better off now with the diversity of the guys we have than last year with all Murray
I will break down all of Darren McFadden's runs here in the same way I broke down Randle's. I will try to include pics to make a better argument, whether I am right or wrong in my previous assessments of DMac.
Let me also preface by saying, I would love to see McFadden become the guy. His explosion and speed is exciting for me too. If he earns the spot, I will root for him.
Here we go:
2nd Quarter
10:53 McFadden off LT for 8 yards: There is a gaping hole and McFadden is quickly to the second level.
His speed and explosion allow him to the second level before the defense can react. He isn't even touched until he hits the 45.
This is the same play Randle popped off his big gains. This was our best designed running play in the game. McFadden flashes here so well, it's easy to understand excitement.
10:07 McFadden off LG for 3 yards: There is a gaping hole pre-snap. This looks like it was actually an audible by Romo when he saw the hole over the LG.
Unfortunately, for whatever reason, McFadden hesitates for a step or two which enables the linebacker to get to the hole before him. This should have been a hitter, but McFadden's hesitation slowed it down.
8:34 McFadden off RT for 3 yards: There is another gaping hole for McFadden to the right side. Again, this should be a big hitter.
Instead, McFadden for some reason pauses and take a few stutter steps, giving the Giants time to converge and close the hole.
7:17 McFadden of RG for 3 yards: This is the same play the Cowboys ran the first snap of the game. McFadden makes a decisive cut this time and, although the backside defender is there, he is able to pick up 3 yards. This is a good, hard and decisive run. This is the dirty work. This is what he needs to do more of.
3rd Quarter
4:53 McFadden off LT pushed out of bounds after 1 yard gain: He does so many things wrong on this run I don't know where to start.
First hole he passes up is a gaping cutback that would have netted atleast 3-4 yards, or hit the burners to the outside, but instead he pauses and stutter steps again
The same moment from another angle shows how indecisive he was. Anything was better than stuttering. Cut and go, or hit the outside with speed.
He finally commits to going outside. Once he does, he has another opportunity to either turn on the jets or cut back, he hesitates again...
At this point, Beasley has been blocking for several second and loses his man. McFadden doesn't lower his shoulder and try to run through the smaller DB, he's pushed out of bounds... This is the run where he lost me.
4th Quarter
9:05 McFadden up the middle for -2 yards: He has no shot here.
Whitehead is beat to the insdie by Collins and pops McFadden in the backfield. As X and I have pointed out in several other threads, the blocking at the next level as well as by the TE/WRs in the game was horrendous. If Whitehead can just chip Colling, McFadden may go the distance.
My analysis:
As I have said in a plethora of threads now, McFadden shows liveliness. He is fluid, quick and fast. He has prototypical size and looks as though he could/should be able to break tackles. The unfortunate truth is, just like in Oakland, he doesn't have the patience, confidence or vision needed to take full advantage of his gifts. The holes he missed were gaping and he literally either ran away from them, or waited for them to close.
I want him to show up on the field. I want to see that home run ability in a feature back. The unfortunate truth is, McFadden doesn't have the most important tools (as Emmitt showed us) to be a feature back: The vision, the confidence and the patience. If you are mad that Randle is leaving yards on the field, McFadden should be maddening for you. Will he hit a big shot here and there? Yes. But he is going to strike out far more often. That's why he's a change of pace guy. That's why I prefer Randle.
Now, a caveat to all of this is, he missed some training camp and is on a new team. Could he gain the confidence and understand the scheme better? Certainly! Could that lead to better decision making and less busted runs? Absolutely. Does history show that will be the case? No.
McFadden doesnt have what it takes to be a feature back, those are just the facts. One more year isnt going to change that. His biggest thing is a lack of vision and an inability to make moves or change the directions. That cut back option is the perfect example. He stutters his way into a 1 yard gain. speed and size are great, but if you cant find the holes, cut back to the open field, and the moves to make it all work, what good is it. He will be better in the passing game and may hit a big run or two if he hits a gaping hole once in a while.DMC had 7 carries in the preseason and 6 carries in the opener. Drawing conclusions at this point is..... pointless.
Good stuff you did your homework. I think DMac will get better with this offense in time. He has what it takes he just never had an offense like this. He'll see these replays too and realize he needs to improve.
I for one think we are better off now with the diversity of the guys we have than last year with all Murray
Yeah? Makes me think they just don't trust him.
DMC had 7 carries in the preseason and 6 carries in the opener. Drawing conclusions at this point is..... pointless.
I think they are going to mix and match throughout the season depending on opponent, health, etc. These threads about who is better are going to go on until draft day next year when they spend a high pick on a RB.
12 Months ago all the threads were about the blowout loss to the 49ers and "Is this the worst team of the last 30 years". I'll take a RB discussion any day.
Yeah? Makes me think they just don't trust him.
DMC had 7 carries in the preseason and 6 carries in the opener. Drawing conclusions at this point is..... pointless.
McFadden doesnt have what it takes to be a feature back, those are just the facts. One more year isnt going to change that.
This sort of confirms my feeling( strum has mentioned this too) that Dmac is a bad fit for zone scheme.good job OP.
DMC is still learning how the line blocks..and the play changes at the line...He has less than 20 carries in live action and you judge him on that....he is the still the best back on the team.....lets see a critical breakdown of Randle now to be far....