Twitter: Darren Woodson Snubbed for HOF Again

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by ClappingCarrot, Jan 5, 2021.

  1. perrykemp

    perrykemp Well-Known Member

    10,975 Messages
    8,272 Likes Received
    go check out his 2009 DPOY highlights.
     
  2. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    The 57 career INTs are the only reason Everson Walls keeps being brought up for the Hall of Fame and why he keeps touting himself for the Hall of Fame. INT’s may be the number one stat the Hall of Fame voters look at when judging DBs but it’s not the only stat. Corners are going to get more INT’s than safeties. Despite all the INT’s Walls only returned one for a TD. He had a lot of INT’s but he also got burned a lot. The one play that hurt his career more than any was the Dwight Clark catch in the 1981 NFC title game. He got fooled on the play and that’s the play fans remember most about him. It made the cover of Sports Illustrated and has haunted him since. When he arrived in Dallas the Cowboys were losing title games every year. The team was on the decline. During his prime years with the team the Cowboys weren’t good. If you want to keep going on feel free!
     
    mrmojo likes this.
  3. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    I never said a DB with more INT’s is automatically a better player than one with fewer INTs. You’re twisting my comments to create arguments. Lol That’s like saying a QB with the most career TD passes is better than those who had fewer. Get real!
     
  4. OmerV

    OmerV Well-Known Member

    21,970 Messages
    18,390 Likes Received
    Yes, he gets brought up, but not voted in despite the fact he has more carreer INTs than most DBs that are in, and despite the fact you keep arguing as if INTs are a stand alone standard for getting into the HOF and for judging who is a better player.

    But now it appears you are agreeing that it is not a stand alone stat, which is all I have been saying all along.
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2021
  5. OmerV

    OmerV Well-Known Member

    21,970 Messages
    18,390 Likes Received
    lol - all I have said all along was that having more career INT's doesn't necessarily mean a DB is better than another DB, especially when one is a CB and one is a safety. You jumped into this by disputing that. Now you are saying you don't dispute it? Then what the hell were you arguing about? lol
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2021
  6. atlantacowboy

    atlantacowboy Well-Known Member

    10,821 Messages
    14,883 Likes Received
    He was too quiet as a player. If he had pranced around and done more of the "look at me and what I just did" antics, he would be in the HOF. Great player overshadowed by other great players on his own team.
     
  7. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    I never said INTs are a stand alone standard. You continue to twist my comments. With the Cowboys season done you’re obviously bored.
     
  8. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    I never disputed any of that you’re the one arguing! lol
     
  9. OmerV

    OmerV Well-Known Member

    21,970 Messages
    18,390 Likes Received
    Then tell me what you disputed.

    The only point I ever made was that having more career INT's doesn't necessarily mean a person is/was a better player than one with fewer INT's.

    Since that's all I was saying, how could you dispute what I was saying and still claim you weren't disputing that?
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2021
  10. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    I disputed that Darren Woodson was better than Charles Woodson. You decided to enter the discussion with an agenda to twist my comments because you were looking for an argument. You’re bored!
     
  11. OmerV

    OmerV Well-Known Member

    21,970 Messages
    18,390 Likes Received
    That's a nonsensical response because I never said Darren Woodson was better than Charles Woodson.

    In fact, I specifically said I thought Charles Woodson was the better player.

    Try again …
     
  12. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    I never accused you of saying Darren Woodson was better than Charles Woodson. Another poster did and you joined the discussion and twisted my comments. You were looking for an argument.
     
  13. OmerV

    OmerV Well-Known Member

    21,970 Messages
    18,390 Likes Received
    lol - wow, that's hilarious. You are a bizarre guy

    In your previous post you said you disputed me because you were disputing that Darren Woodson was better than Charles Woodson …

    then in this post a few short minutes later you said you never accused me of saying Darren was better than Charles, despite having just admitted that was the basis of your dispute with me.

    That makes absolutely no sense at all.


    Yes, I entered into a conversation with another poster, and then you inserted yourself into that conversation.

    And since that time you have argued in post after post after post that what I said was wrong.

    And now you are claiming you never disputed what I said?
     
  14. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    Look who’s talking. :laugh: You’ve been following me around for 2 days twisting my comments because you obviously have nothing else better to do. Do you see anyone else following me around making up things just to keep this going? lol
     
  15. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    You inserted yourself into a discussion I was in. You can’t get anything straight. Lol You took exception to some of my comments and decided to twist them.
     
  16. OmerV

    OmerV Well-Known Member

    21,970 Messages
    18,390 Likes Received
    I responded to that poster's comment - that established a dialogue between he and I. Then you responded to me, and quoted me, and disputed what I said.

    And now you are oddly claiming you never disputed what I said despite creating post after post after post after post doing just that.

    And what's funny is neither me, nor the poster I responded to about the career INTs, ever said Darren was better than Charles, yet now you are claiming that as entire basis of your dispute with me.

    And even then you are saying that was the basis of your dispute with me, yet never thought I said it to begin with.

    It's like the meds haven't kicked in yet

    GET TO THE HEART OF IT …. What are you now telling me I said that you disputed in post after post.
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2021
  17. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    I responded to this comment and you joined in. Shortly there after you began twisting my comments to create an ongoing argument. It’s day two and you’re continuing to do it.

     
  18. OmerV

    OmerV Well-Known Member

    21,970 Messages
    18,390 Likes Received
    I responded to another poster about career INT totals determining who what the better player. My response to that is what you responded to me about.

    Now, cut out out the endless smokescreen …

    What was it that I said that you disputed?
     
  19. KJJ

    KJJ You Have an Axe to Grind

    34,902 Messages
    14,089 Likes Received
    Dude you initiated the discussion we’re having. Look through the thread and see for yourself! This is the first exchange we had it’s on page 4 and you initiated it. :thumbup:

     
  20. OmerV

    OmerV Well-Known Member

    21,970 Messages
    18,390 Likes Received
    Quit stalling, ..

    What were you disputing that I said?
     

Share This Page