Video: David Carr challenges Dak Prescott to a passing competition

Status
Not open for further replies.
G2

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,928
Reaction score
26,517
khiladi said:
And yet we won on Romo’s arm who threw for 356 yards and Randle in the backfield with a Zach Martin playing with a bad neck and a new OL coach for the first year in charge of the running game in Frank Pollack while Dak couldn’t move the ball against third string scrubs in Philly and we won this year despite Dak and so on.. totally different scenarios.
Click to expand...
It would be helpful for all of you Romo homers and much less painful if you just suck it up and except that Dak is a different QB than Romo. "Won on Romo's arm." LMAO...So funny.
 
pete026

pete026

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,086
Reaction score
1,197
Well it made 32.

So will it be:

A. 33
B. Drama Zone

In the words of John and Paul; please let it B.
 
TheMarathonContinues

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,485
Reaction score
76,336
khiladi said:
How does 2-1 suck, while throwing for 356 yards and winning games on his arm.. Romo also started slow in 2014 in his first game.. but his ‘suck’ is light years better than Dak..

You have no argument, because Dak was garbage a whole season long and set all sorts of Cowboys records in futility during 16 games and couldn’t even move the ball against third string scrubs in Philly.
Click to expand...

Once again....there's no argument being made. You are the one arguing which suck is better. I'm not sure if something mentally is wrong with you or you are trolling....... you are pulling 2-1 It of your arse.
 
G2

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,928
Reaction score
26,517
khiladi said:
How does 2-1 suck, while throwing for 356 yards and winning games on his arm.. Romo also started slow in 2014 in his first game.. but his ‘suck’ is light years better than Dak..

You have no argument, because Dak was garbage a whole season long and set all sorts of Cowboys records in futility during 16 games and couldn’t even move the ball against third string scrubs in Philly.
Click to expand...
False
 
khiladi

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,812
Reaction score
37,214
rocyaice said:
Once again....there's no argument being made. You are the one arguing which suck is better. I'm not sure if something mentally is wrong with you or you are trolling....... you are pulling 2-1 It of your arse.
Click to expand...

Romo was 2-1 in 2015.. you tried to justify Dak’s suckage by comparing it to Romo’s ‘suckage’.. so how is 356 yards anywhere alike to the records in offensive futility we experienced with Dak as QB through a whole season type suckage..
 
khiladi

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,812
Reaction score
37,214
Streetwise said:
It would be helpful for all of you Romo homers and much less painful if you just suck it up and except that Dak is a different QB than Romo. "Won on Romo's arm." LMAO...So funny.
Click to expand...

Yes there are different.. one was great and the current one is a scrub..
 
TheMarathonContinues

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,485
Reaction score
76,336
khiladi said:
Romo was 2-1 in 2015.. you tried to justify Dak’s suckage by comparing it to Romo’s ‘suckage’.. so how is 356 yards anywhere alike to the records in offensive futility we experienced with Dak as QB through a whole season type suckage..
Click to expand...
He was 2-1 because we played trash. He was trash that year. You guys pretend like the last we saw if Romo was 2014....nah...... it was 2015. Let Romo be. He's moved on....why can't his nuggers move on too?
 
khiladi

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,812
Reaction score
37,214
rocyaice said:
He was 2-1 because we played trash. He was trash that year. You guys pretend like the last we saw if Romo was 2014....nah...... it was 2015. Let Romo be. He's moved on....why can't his nuggers move on too?
Click to expand...

So let us say they were ‘trash’. Dak threw 93 yards against trash and set offensive records of futility even against trash, while Romo threw 356 yards against ‘trash’...

So again how does Romo’s ‘suckage’ compare to Dak’s actual suckage?
 
TheMarathonContinues

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,485
Reaction score
76,336
khiladi said:
So let us say they were ‘trash’. Dak threw 93 yards against trash and set offensive records of futility even against trash, while Romo threw 356 yards against ‘trash’...

So again how does Romo’s ‘suckage’ compare to Dak’s actual suckage?
Click to expand...
You tell me. You're the one comparing them.
 
Corso

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,754
Reaction score
63,169
khiladi said:
And yet we won on Romo’s arm who threw for 356 yards and Randle in the backfield with a Zach Martin playing with a bad neck and a new OL coach for the first year in charge of the running game in Frank Pollack while Dak couldn’t move the ball against third string scrubs in Philly and we won this year despite Dak and so on.. totally different scenarios.
Click to expand...
Sorry, but the Cowboys won nothing on Romo's arm. Nothing. Not a darn thing.
But I guess I get the direction of this conversation and that wasn't what you were saying, but...

Nothing. The Cowboys won nothing with Romo. Probably win nothing with Dak either, but hey! I'm not arguing that either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top