It was actually. We needed a slot WR and we got a guy who can be a star number 1 WR in the league he was definitely BPA on board
Never change Raiders...never change.
I respect your outsider looking in. But if you're a spy, I'll have to shoot you.My guess is that the Eagles are more interested in OL or DB help than at WR in the 1st rd.
Hey you were going to whine like a baby no matter what and this is all you got?That’s why Dallas doesn’t win.
Yeah and you could possibly trade one of them.Think about it this way. Lamb will have two years of experience when 1) Coopers guarenteed is up. 2) Gallup's rookie contract is up.
In Lamb you have ready replacement for either of them. Thats been one of the points the WR at #17 set has been making
But we’re exciting on offense. It generates fans, revenue and fantasy.That’s why Dallas doesn’t win.
Agreed about RB.BPA is a stupid philosophy. Take BPA at positions of need. Overlay value. If BPA was RB you would not take them.
9ers lost Buckner though didn't they?I mean, look at what Lynch did with Kinlaw. He really didn't need a D player either, but he went BPA.
I hate he did it, but yeah, there's something to be said for that approach.
I hated the Cooper contract. Now I really hate it.
Agreed about RB.
But sometime the BPA just also happens to be at a position of need.
Something tells me Mike McCarthy knows our positions of need more than you do.
mattjames is upset at the pick?
Color me stunned.