JMech
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 510
- Reaction score
- 517
dmq;2860012 said:I don't care who wins as long as Proctor isn't on the field.
With any luck, Proctor gets a bus ticket out of DFW.
dmq;2860012 said:I don't care who wins as long as Proctor isn't on the field.
dmq;2860012 said:I don't care who wins as long as Proctor isn't on the field.
JMech;2860025 said:With any luck, Proctor gets a bus ticket out of DFW.
Idgit;2859950 said:He is, and it did. And smart posters are still expecting him to be replaced by Holland in a straight-up competition this season. I don't get it.
NextGenBoys;2860223 said:Because Holland is bigger and has more size.
Football isn't played on paper.
Ironic comment given that Holland's advantage of size would be "on paper" -- i.e., on his stat sheet. Once it comes to actually playing football Kosier has been our most consistent lineman the past 3 years.NextGenBoys;2860223 said:Because Holland is bigger and has more size.
Football isn't played on paper.
theogt;2860288 said:Ironic comment given that Holland's advantage of size would be "on paper" -- i.e., on his stat sheet. Once it comes to actually playing football Kosier has been our most consistent lineman the past 3 years.
theogt;2860288 said:Ironic comment given that Holland's advantage of size would be "on paper" -- i.e., on his stat sheet. Once it comes to actually playing football Kosier has been our most consistent lineman the past 3 years.
Idgit;2860265 said:I don't have a problem with Holland. He looked pretty good for a few games last season and is a definite upgrade over Proctor. I just don't get why a career journeyman with weight control issues is considered an upgrade over a player who does nothing but work hard and smart and whose loss last year kneecapped the entire OL.
Whoops. My bad.NextGenBoys;2860306 said:That was my point. Kosier is the better linemen, but people want Holland because he looks better on paper.
I'm on your side dude haha.
I don't blame or hate Garrett. I think it's typical for coaches to be overly conservative putting a new guy in. It can be frustrating for fans, but it's understandable from a coach's perspective.AbeBeta;2860292 said:So your Garrett hate doesn't put you in the "Holland was ready to go but Garrett wouldn't use him because Garrett is stupid" camp?
theogt;2860317 said:I don't blame or hate Garrett. I think it's typical for coaches to be overly conservative putting a new guy in. It can be frustrating for fans, but it's understandable from a coach's perspective.
It might. But even when the "new guy" is outperforming the other guy in practice, I think most coaches are generally too hesitant. There's an extreme risk aversion among coaches, which is understandable.AbeBeta;2860328 said:It certainly might also indicate that the new guy isn't blowing people away in practice....
Actually, wasn't Wade the one that sort of indirectly chastised Garrett in a press conference about not getting Felix and Choice more involved?burmafrd;2860330 said:I think it was Wade more then anyone else that hesitated. Remember how he was with Choice and Jones and others- always afraid to give the young guys a shot. And of course you remember his immortal words about the proctologist being the best O lineman one game.....
Real1st;2859928 said:The most underrated player on the roster..
The offensive line collapsed when he went down.
Alexander;2860348 said:And that is what is a bit alarming.
Losing one starting left guard shouldn't turn a quality line into an utter mess.
I still wish someone could detail why losing his "communication" made it such an issue.
I understand the step down to the likes of Cory Proctor is a problem, but it was glaring.
So is Kosier that good, Proctor that bad or is there another issue entirely with the chemistry and coaching with line that contributed?