Defense or Offense

Gangsta Spanksta

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,467
Reaction score
9,709
A good Offense that keeps the Defense off the field can help a defense out to regroup if they are struggling. Throwing interceptions to make the defense go right back out doesn't help.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,830
Reaction score
12,612
They scored a Td on 7/8 possessions. It was never going to be a game no matter what
Six TDs, one of which was pretty short.

Momentum and situations can change things a ton. It's actually a big part of how Dallas domimated some teams.
 

JBS

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,317
Reaction score
23,613
Six TDs, one of which was pretty short.

Momentum and situations can change things a ton. It's actually a big part of how Dallas domimated some teams.
Yeah. Sure. Nice try.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,635
Reaction score
22,404
Yeah, Aaron Donald can collapse a pocket.

I don’t want a 2 down linemen with big resources spent.
You poke fun when he can change whole games by demanding 2-3 blockers every play or you lose.

As to a two down player, that is the Dallas usual game play here and now...all rotate to include Parsons.
 

zrinkill

Cowboy Fan
Messages
48,966
Reaction score
32,397
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
30288906-8481111-THEN_Mia_Agraviador_age_six_saying_her_signature_porque_no_los_d-m-28_1593642465664.jpg
 

rnr_honeybadger

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,856
Reaction score
18,176
You have to wonder what the Cowboys could get in trade for Parsons and Dak. It could be a quick rebuild if you get enough resources.
1. It would have to be a substantial haul
2. You need to make sure that you are using those picks to actually improve the team.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,635
Reaction score
22,404
No I just don’t like wasting picks when defending the run isn’t a difficult thing to do.
Do show us the magic that does just that. You ever play linebacker and take on an offensive tackle?
 

zenmastersauce

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,233
Reaction score
1,231
The Cowboys would have lost that game even with prime years Tom Brady at QB.

Yes, Dak/CeeDee failed but it didn't matter.

Just sign the best free agent RB and spend all other resources on the defense.

Must stop the run.

Also, none of the CBs are burners. Diggs, Bland, Gilmore and Lewis are all good but none are ideal matchups vs the elite speed WRs.

LBs...Add one elite off-ball LB and Clark/Bell would be fine as the 2nd and 3rdLBs in the depth chart instead of 1st and 2nd.

Envision the defense with a Fred Warner clone added. Even with no other changes, that would completely change this defense.

...No, Shaq Leonard wasn't that guy anymore...

Having said all of the above, I wouldn't extend Dak's contract. He is under contract for 2024; although that prevents them from pushing any of his 2024 cap hit into the future.

Give Lance a chance.
I like this plan. Dak plays his year out and we see. But we need to deal with our defensive ability to actually be solid not soft when it comes down to it. The tape told everyone that Dallas does poorly against motion. What did GB do? Motion. What did SF do? Motion. And then teams like Philly and Miami and Buffalo what did we not do there? Cannot stop the run. And you can forget about game ending drives. So who we stopping?
 

zenmastersauce

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,233
Reaction score
1,231
I think they need multiple TRUE LBers. Bell and Clark aren’t the answer— even as backups.

Thank goodness Quinn is gonna be gone so we stop the experiment of playing DBs as LBs
You think they fire Quinn? Or does he just part ways?
 

starfan1

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,249
Reaction score
12,337
A good Offense that keeps the Defense off the field can help a defense out to regroup if they are struggling. Throwing interceptions to make the defense go right back out doesn't help.
it was the first darn quarter Its TEAM loss but i realize its fashionable to blame JUST the offense especially if youre not a fan of the QB. They didnt play very well in any phase of the team period. And this defense has shown time and time again that they cannot get critical stops regardless of whether the offense puts them in a hole or not. The tone was set on the first drive when they literally marched it down the field with ease and while i understand Daks picks didnt help.

The defense had no clue all game. Quinn stayed in a zone and Love had his arse for breakfast.

I dont care what they do at the QB position the defense has to be the biggest concern moving forward. Then you can talk about whether its QB or Scheme or coaching all of which are concerns but none bigger than the defense
 

Creeper

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,375
Reaction score
19,477
The Cowboys would have lost that game even with prime years Tom Brady at QB.

Yes, Dak/CeeDee failed but it didn't matter.

Just sign the best free agent RB and spend all other resources on the defense.

Must stop the run.

Also, none of the CBs are burners. Diggs, Bland, Gilmore and Lewis are all good but none are ideal matchups vs the elite speed WRs.

LBs...Add one elite off-ball LB and Clark/Bell would be fine as the 2nd and 3rdLBs in the depth chart instead of 1st and 2nd.

Envision the defense with a Fred Warner clone added. Even with no other changes, that would completely change this defense.

...No, Shaq Leonard wasn't that guy anymore...

Having said all of the above, I wouldn't extend Dak's contract. He is under contract for 2024; although that prevents them from pushing any of his 2024 cap hit into the future.

Give Lance a chance.
I generally agree. The Dak situation is complicated. I wish they did not give him that no trade deal. That was an awful decision. I hate to let him go for nothing but that's water under the bridge.

But one point about the offense. Clearly, the Packers plan was to take CeeDee out of the game and not let him go wild against them. They were throwing coverages in his direction the entire game and when Dak threw that pick 6 he was trying to force the ball to CeeDee. When a team does that, the Cowboys, and especially Dak, needs to find another receiver. I feel they used Cooks all wrong. He is a guy you want to hit on the run. Throwing him 3 yard slants and curls is a waste of what he is good at. He is too small for some routes. His best attribute is his speed and the way they used him much of the season did not take advantage of that. But my point is, offenses are best when you spread the ball around, not when you focus on 1 guy. Any good team can take 1 guy away. I hear fans say "get the ball to your playmakers" and that is a great idea, unless the other team is determined to take your playmakers out of the game. You have to scheme them open, or you have to find the open receivers. If they are doubling CeeDee, then someone else has to be open and the QB should see the double team immediately and throw to someone else.

As for the defense, I agree. Watching Tampa Bay destroy the Eagles last night I was wishing our defense could play with that intensity, and urgency, and power. The Eagles OL is one of the best in the league and the Tampa front obliterated them. Yes, they blitzed a lot, which I love, but they are strong up front and made life difficult for the Eagles. I know, it's one game but why can't the Cowboys come out and play fired up like that for a playoff game?

As a side note, Cam Jurgens looked pretty ordinary last night. Every seems to think that guys like Kelce can be easily replaced in the draft. Jurgens is not Kelce and when Kelce retires, which I think will be soon, their OL is going to suffer big time. A lesson for us all. Replacing players is not as easy as it looks. For those who want to get rid of Tyron Smith, and I understand why, should think about what rookie is going to step in a play as well as Tyron? It is probably not going to happen like that.

The Cowboys need to get stronger up front. Whoever told Mazi to lose 40 lbs and play a 3T should be fired immediately. The Cowboys need to fix their front 7. Or, if you are going to go small and quick, then be aggressive. Small players playing soft is a recipe for disaster.

I am all in favor of drafting a big strong rangy LB with instincts in any round where it makes sense, including the first. I am fine with drafting a DT again. And they need DEs who can play the run and rush the passer. Tall order of course, which is why the solution may be drafting and signing free agents which the Cowboys won't do. But we can win with Dak if we have a defense that can make an occasional stop. I think you are right though, the priority should be defense. If they can build a strong defense, then they can deal with Dak if they have to.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,162
Reaction score
64,684
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I think they need multiple TRUE LBers. Bell and Clark aren’t the answer— even as backups.

Thank goodness Quinn is gonna be gone so we stop the experiment of playing DBs as LBs
See Hitchens and Wilson...Average here, good with KC.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,162
Reaction score
64,684
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I generally agree. The Dak situation is complicated. I wish they did not give him that no trade deal. That was an awful decision. I hate to let him go for nothing but that's water under the bridge.

But one point about the offense. Clearly, the Packers plan was to take CeeDee out of the game and not let him go wild against them. They were throwing coverages in his direction the entire game and when Dak threw that pick 6 he was trying to force the ball to CeeDee. When a team does that, the Cowboys, and especially Dak, needs to find another receiver. I feel they used Cooks all wrong. He is a guy you want to hit on the run. Throwing him 3 yard slants and curls is a waste of what he is good at. He is too small for some routes. His best attribute is his speed and the way they used him much of the season did not take advantage of that. But my point is, offenses are best when you spread the ball around, not when you focus on 1 guy. Any good team can take 1 guy away. I hear fans say "get the ball to your playmakers" and that is a great idea, unless the other team is determined to take your playmakers out of the game. You have to scheme them open, or you have to find the open receivers. If they are doubling CeeDee, then someone else has to be open and the QB should see the double team immediately and throw to someone else.

As for the defense, I agree. Watching Tampa Bay destroy the Eagles last night I was wishing our defense could play with that intensity, and urgency, and power. The Eagles OL is one of the best in the league and the Tampa front obliterated them. Yes, they blitzed a lot, which I love, but they are strong up front and made life difficult for the Eagles. I know, it's one game but why can't the Cowboys come out and play fired up like that for a playoff game?

As a side note, Cam Jurgens looked pretty ordinary last night. Every seems to think that guys like Kelce can be easily replaced in the draft. Jurgens is not Kelce and when Kelce retires, which I think will be soon, their OL is going to suffer big time. A lesson for us all. Replacing players is not as easy as it looks. For those who want to get rid of Tyron Smith, and I understand why, should think about what rookie is going to step in a play as well as Tyron? It is probably not going to happen like that.

The Cowboys need to get stronger up front. Whoever told Mazi to lose 40 lbs and play a 3T should be fired immediately. The Cowboys need to fix their front 7. Or, if you are going to go small and quick, then be aggressive. Small players playing soft is a recipe for disaster.

I am all in favor of drafting a big strong rangy LB with instincts in any round where it makes sense, including the first. I am fine with drafting a DT again. And they need DEs who can play the run and rush the passer. Tall order of course, which is why the solution may be drafting and signing free agents which the Cowboys won't do. But we can win with Dak if we have a defense that can make an occasional stop. I think you are right though, the priority should be defense. If they can build a strong defense, then they can deal with Dak if they have to.
Mazi was 323 at the combine...
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,299
Reaction score
33,198
It got to 27-0 with two long TD drives and two scores resulting from Dak picks. Plenty of blame to go around.
Both picks were in first half taking away any chance at a recovery

On the first pick CD is running free behind Cook, no need to throw to a covered WR

The second pick was completely inexcusable and a direct result of being confused and not reading the defense

Then don’t forget the idiotic sack he took also in the first half to knock us out of FG rsnge

This guy is a proven playoff loser over 8 years. What more do his idiot jock sniffers want? Get rid of Dak please
 
Top