neosapien23
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,897
- Reaction score
- 161
SkinsandTerps said:That would be an assumption on your part (as far as their football knowledge) , and seemingly biased for you to think that its not at all possible that some people may think that Woodson or Green were at least on par with Sanders.
I am not talking about his stint in DC at all, I am talking the span of his career.
I never said that Sanders wasnt a great player in fact, I said he was exceptional. If the total package isnt included in your analysis than by default you are presenting a biased opinion.
I never said Green was better either. However, if you want to talk about coverage skills...if you dont think they are comparable then you havent watched enough football.
Green was a great corner, but he had his problems with Michael Irvin. Granted Irvin was the master of the push off, but the point is that Deion had an advantage because of his size. I actually prefer Green to Deion too so please don't think of me as a homer. Green was exceptional in his craft. He could cover and tackle. He was also much more durable despite being smaller. I remember most teams would run right at Deion knowing they could wear him down. Green on the other hand would make the tackle despite being heavily outweighed. Green was the better overall corner, but Deion definitely had an edge on coverage.