Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,853
- Reaction score
- 43,787
the difference in money was of the magnitude of 7-8 million over the same length of contract. hardly small potatoes.Agreed
I know you and I are on the opposite end of pretty much everything but we agree here.
He bolted to a hated rival for not that much more than he was offered to stay here, and for less than what he was offered elsewhere (Oakland, I believe)
Loved him in Dallas and I know it's a business but he burned a lot of bridges on the way out the door.
It wasn't the biggest money offered to him though. Which is why it was a smack in the face. I think it was the 3rd highest offer I think the raiders and titans offered 10m+ a year.the difference in money was of the magnitude of 7-8 million over the same length of contract. hardly small potatoes.
the difference in money was of the magnitude of 7-8 million over the same length of contract. hardly small potatoes.
He bolted to a hated rival for not that much more than he was offered to stay here, and for less than what he was offered elsewhere (Oakland, I believe)
I mean but really, what else is he gonna say?
Means nothing.
he wound up making 9 million from philly for one year. but he picked up a 25.5 million deal from the titans when he was traded along with more guaranteed money. he made out like a champ. he owes more to himself and his family than the cowboys. it is, we're reminded often, a business.How much of that was guaranteed though?
He didn't play out his contract in Philly so I would guess he didn't get all that money.
In the end, I think it was probably negligible. I could be wrong though.... I'm not dogmatically saying I'm right, going more from memory
How could you hate a guy for accepting the Eagles offer?
More guaranteed at signing, more guarantees and a higher salary.
he would up making 9 million from philly for one year. but he picked up a 25.5 million deal from the titans when he was traded along with more guaranteed money. he made out like a champ. he owes more to himself and his family than the cowboys. it is, we're reminded often, a business.
Long term yes, but not short term(Romo era).
While Romo may of shattered his collarbone anyways, I felt having Murray and not that knucklehead Randle would of altered our gameplan.
Understandable. But we're talking millions. The way players are cut loose regardless of contracts justifies players treating it like a business.It is.
If it had been anyone but Philly, it probably wouldn't have bothered me (and many others) so much.....
But he didn't take the biggest deal which is why it was a smack in the face. If the eagles offered the most money we wouldn't be as salty.Understandable. But we're talking millions. The way players are cut loose regardless of contracts justifies players treating it like a business.
But I totally get the Philly thing. Which is why I chuckled a little inside when Murray and Austin didn't amount to much there.
It was more than what Dallas offered, so at that point it's a moot point unless you dig into all the salary contract details.But he didn't take the biggest deal which is why it was a smack in the face. If the eagles offered the most money we wouldn't be as salty.
Sure, but we didn't replace him with Randle - it was Randle and McFadden. And for 2015 McFadden did put up better numbers (4.6 YPC to 3.6, mostly due to our OL) while making 1.25MM to the 9MM DeMarco was paid that year.
And in fairness, none of us knew that Randle was insane.
I don't care that Demarco didn't resign with us it's that he turned down bigger offers to go to a division rivalIt was more than what Dallas offered, so at that point it's a moot point unless you dig into all the salary contract details.