Demarcus Disses Free -video added post 80

Picksix;3357371 said:
260 + posts on what one player "might have" been implying. Thursday just cannot get here fast enough. :bang2: :bang2: :bang2:

:fact:

And I know you mean so that we can find someone to replace Flo since Doug Fail obviously is incompetent and can't do it.
 
theebs;3357394 said:
lol

Yea I will try, what time does it end? Is there an actual estimated time?

Are you doing one friday also?

We plan on starting a little while before Dallas picks.

Going to also be on Saturday night for complete post draft show.
 
Bleu Star;3357323 said:
Wow. You guys really read between the lines. :rolleyes: They could use your skills over in Afghanistan. They need some more cryptographers.

dcfanatic;3357350 said:
Not really since this was alredy posted in here like 90 posts ago.

:laugh1:

And since we all know if he was asked about Free what he would say.

You should stick to the silly conversations.

You do better in those.

Don't hate. Cryptography for dummies. Are you familiar with it?

Picksix;3357371 said:
260 + posts on what one player "might have" been implying. Thursday just cannot get here fast enough. :bang2: :bang2: :bang2:

Exactly. This is so lame! Go go gadget round 1.
 
I guess no one had any thought on the question I asked about what he said. Maybe it was just a terrible question. lol
 
Bleu Star;3357463 said:
Exactly. This is so lame! Go go gadget round 1.


you kidding? this is greatness......where else can you see such over reaction over a player not saying another players name?....and see people so committed that their interpretation is correct and everyone else are complete tools for not following along
 
MadCow;3356873 said:
Your comment speaks negatively of Demarcus' speaking ability. I personally have never found this to be the case.

I also believe it may be oversight on his part regarding Free; however, that has nothing to do with being a good speaker. Let's be responsible with the words we use.

I'm going by a past experience I had with Demarcus when he couldn't spell the word "cardiac." My friend wanted him to sign a helmet saying "Cardiac Cowboys" and he signed it "Cardiack Cowboys." Now that one instance obviously can't judge Demarcus as a whole, but I was going by my personal experience I had. These guys are football players, not public or motivational speakers; they say things in the heat of the moment without thinking sometimes. I didn't mean to offend you or anyone.
 
Maybe it was a diss and maybe it wasnt, none of us know for a fact what Ware actually thinks of Free. The whole point is that it really doesnt matter guys, so everybody needs to just calm down.


Free will either be able to handle the job or he wont when the ball is snapped, period!!!!!



As for drafting a LT, there are no starting LTs at #27 so everybody thinking we are going to draft a replacement for Flo are going to be highly dissappointed. Also, how many teams with rookie LTs have made it to the SuperBowl???
 
Cover 2;3357147 said:
I'm a Free supporter and even I took Ware's nonresponse as him not thinking Free is the answer. I still think Free has what it takes, but to dismiss this is blind homerism. He didn't mention Free because he doesn't consider him a legitimate candidate to replace Flo. I think Free will prove him wrong, but we will see.

Best post in the thread bar none...

We can only hope and pray at this point in time that Free proves us all wrong...
 
What I want to know: if Ware thinks we either need to draft a guy or bring back Flo, what's that say about the tackles potentially available for trade from other teams? I assume we can all agree that by not mentioning any of them entirely that's tacit proof that Ware doesn't think they're viable options.
 
Idgit;3357556 said:
What I want to know: if Ware thinks we either need to draft a guy or bring back Flo, what's that say about the tackles potentially available for trade from other teams? I assume we can all agree that by not mentioning any of them entirely that's tacit proof that Ware doesn't think they're viable options.

:bow:
 
theebs;3356989 said:
when I get a chance I will. And I can pretty much tell you knowing wares personality in interviews I wont take it as a stab at free in anyway.

Especially when I heard bradie james on the radio support doug free today. And if there was a sentiment that free cant play in the locker room Bradie is a guy that talks straight in interviews and he would have said it straight out.

So again, Nothing to it. When ware is asked a direct question about free get back to me, cause I guarantee it wont be a negative comment or a diss.

well said
 
ThreeSportStar80;3357542 said:
Wow, a 20 page thread... Yeah it definitely sounds like Ware doesn't think Free is the guy for the job.

I normally am not a person that deciphers hidden messages or whatever, but when I heard this it just stuck out like a sore thumb. Just his tone and the bold suggestion of actually bringing Flo back without ever mentioning Free.

Like he almost feels disappointed with our current LT situation

Just wanted to know if anyone felt this way too.

Seems like it's split 50/50

Typical Cowboyszone.lol
 
Are we that bored?

A. Demarcus is on record as liking Free and saying he will get him ready

2. Who cares even if Demarcus had his doubts?

D. Hes very astute and well spoken he just wants more linemen in general. You cut a starter, promote a backup, whos the backup? Hes just prepping for hispost career TV gig and giving some details
 
Idgit;3357556 said:
What I want to know: if Ware thinks we either need to draft a guy or bring back Flo, what's that say about the tackles potentially available for trade from other teams? I assume we can all agree that by not mentioning any of them entirely that's tacit proof that Ware doesn't think they're viable options.


OMG. This is golden.

:muttley:
:muttley:
:muttley:
 
Guess I can't get all too worked up about it.

Just don't really care too much.

They're going with Free no matter what any person on the team thinks.

Lots of energy wasted on this one.
 
dcfanatic;3357186 said:
He's an OLB who goes against Free in practice. That's the WR position. Monster difference.


That's weak.

You had an argument for him saying what he said, which is undisputable, but now you're stating he meant something different in both instances ?

Yea, right..
 
Hoofbite;3357602 said:
Guess I can't get all too worked up about it. Just don't really care too much. They're going with Free no matter what any person on the team thinks..

:hammer:

it is what it is..

Like I mentioned earlier, we'll see if the media picks up on it and asks him to clarify his statement. Either he really believes the Cowboys should bring FLO back or draft his replacement because the current option is not good enough, or he meant something else.

Either way, the Cowboys decision makers are going with what they feel is the best option, and that's the bottom line.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
475,017
Messages
14,575,906
Members
24,214
Latest member
whoami2066
Back
Top