You fall way too much for media spew. Prolly been fooled by a tranny a few times.That's true but he was never a leader, he was never vocal, and the defenses routinely folded.
Not impressed by his sack numbers. Took over the New Orleans game and that shows me he could have done it at will and he didn't. Just one game like that a year and I'd get off his back. Nope. At the end of the day his stats here meant absolutely nothing. 0. Nothing.
I hold Witten in the same regard and Romo is not too far behind both of them but not quite on their level.
You fall way too much for media spew. Prolly been fooled by a tranny a few times.
Those 7 all pros just too much for you to attempt to comprehend, hey?And yet we gave up so many third down conversions so I would have appreciated his sacks more had they been on 3rd down. And then also taking over a game once in awhile would have been great.He was not the player he could have been.
You don't even remember where you heard it? Dang, you're just a real winner there!!!!!!!!Show me where that was written in the media. I'll wait.
I had no idea this was the case.About time. Should Ware get in, Dallas will only need 7 more to jump from #9 to #1 bumping off Da Bears in most Hallers.
Man, I hope for your mental health that we win a SB while Parsons is on the team.That's true but he was never a leader, he was never vocal, and the defenses routinely folded.
Not impressed by his sack numbers. Took over the New Orleans game and that shows me he could have done it at will and he didn't. Just one game like that a year and I'd get off his back. Nope. At the end of the day his stats here meant absolutely nothing. 0. Nothing.
I hold Witten in the same regard and Romo is not too far behind both of them but not quite on their level.
Man, I hope for your mental health that we win a SB while Parsons is on the team.
If not, he would be just another "stat padding loser" in your mind.
Nah, I can see it now:Not at all. He makes everyone around him better.
That's true but he was never a leader, he was never vocal, and the defenses routinely folded.
Not impressed by his sack numbers. Took over the New Orleans game and that shows me he could have done it at will and he didn't. Just one game like that a year and I'd get off his back. Nope. At the end of the day his stats here meant absolutely nothing. 0. Nothing.
I hold Witten in the same regard and Romo is not too far behind both of them but not quite on their level.
More all pros than Urlacher. Same amount of probowls.
400 + more tackles in 2 more games played.
Also the Dolphins defense ranked in the top 10 in total yards allowed eight times in 12 seasons with Thomas. the Chicago defense with Urlacher ranked in the top 10 only three times.
Zach only negative was his size and lack of crazy athletics. But he made up for it by being a Sean Lee who was actually healthy.
He deserves to be in the hall. Mawae and Johnson both mentioned in their HOF speeches he deserves to be in. Jimmy can be explained as a homer, but Kevin M was a Jets player.
Zach wasn't flashy on or off the field but he was a playmaker.
To me, this is the strangest psychological trait among sports fans, but it’s incredibly common. When the team doesn’t win, they blame the best players on the team instead of the actual weak links. They never have any actual arguments either, it’s always, “he wasn’t a leader,” “he didn’t elevate the guys around him,” garbage like that, because of course there are no actual arguments to support their case.That's true but he was never a leader, he was never vocal, and the defenses routinely folded.
Not impressed by his sack numbers. Took over the New Orleans game and that shows me he could have done it at will and he didn't. Just one game like that a year and I'd get off his back. Nope. At the end of the day his stats here meant absolutely nothing. 0. Nothing.
I hold Witten in the same regard and Romo is not too far behind both of them but not quite on their level.
To me, this is the strangest psychological trait among sports fans, but it’s incredibly common. When the team doesn’t win, they blame the best players on the team instead of the actual weak links. They never have any actual arguments either, it’s always, “he wasn’t a leader,” “he didn’t elevate the guys around him,” garbage like that, because of course there are no actual arguments to support their case.
Philadelphia fans are particular famous for stupidly turning on their best players, but from what I’ve seen, all fan-bases do it.
This may be the most perfect example of the phenomenon I’ve ever seen.If we are constantly giving up third downs, especially 3rd and longs, and we are folding in December every year, then absolutely I'm looking to a leader to step up. He never did. He was never vocal about it. Nothing ever changed. He and the other two kept repeating the same company line every off-season. It got tiresome.
This may be the most perfect example of the phenomenon I’ve ever seen.
I’m sure you are the arbiter of intelligence…Yeah, there are a few truly stupid people around here....