This reads as if there is an insinuation there.
I think less people would question the move if he moved his agency away from Roc Nation to Condon because it would create arms length distance between his marketing arm and his agency arm. Let's say he moved away his marketing stuff, his agency stuff and his money managing stuff to Condon's company............ I think that would be a questionable move too.
That was my whole point. That given the fact that he's been taken for a ride before, I just would think trying to keep things separate might be a wise move for him instead of throwing everything under one umbrella.
Just my opinion.
[/quote]
Sydla I have no problem with your post. It is a valid statement as I to believe your interest should be separated. I personally have my investments, holdings and retirement fund managed by three different firms. It's investing 101. But I do know a few people that do put all their eggs in one basket. More power to them. So as far as the posters that are questioning the move purely on the fact that they believe like yourself it is a bad business decision, am not referring to them. I actually agree with them.
But as to your comment of "insinuation", have you read some of these comments? For someone to make those statements without even one ounce of proof that Roc Nation is a liability or worse yet criminal, is biased! No question about it. So yes I am insinuating just as much as the ignorant posters are insinuating!