hawklegion
New Member
- Messages
- 262
- Reaction score
- 0
I still say he is fat, makes Holland look like a ballerina.
BrAinPaiNt;3505162 said:It is not an excuse...it is a fact.
Paying someone to play for you is not losing nothing if he does not pan out.
I know you might not like that, but it is a fact.
Now I don't have a problem with the low risk, high reward mantra. Just not someone saying you lose nothing...when you very well do lose something if they don't pan out. You lose money, time and a roster spot even if you take into account you lose some JAG like McQ, it could also mean he was going to be gone anyway and some other player you wanted to keep on the team instead of chancing on the PS would stay.
Sorry I just don't see the need to give the giants credit for signing a player that has been out of football for two years with a bad back and mental issues. We can agree to disagree on that point. What we can not agree to disagree on is the idea that it costs them nothing to sign him when facts say otherwise.
Heck it may turn out to be the best decision and FA pickup they have had in years and he returns to pro bowl form or even better he is a All Pro player...but that still does not take away from the fact that it cost them nothing...unless he is playing for free and they don't lose another player.
cowboyvic;3505074 said:Bingo. Right on the money. this is why i have a real problem with Jerry as our GM. im not even saying it would have worked out. but it was worth a look.
bbgun;3504820 said:And manic depressive. Put them together and he'd make a perfect mother-in-law.
stasheroo;3505171 said:Do us all a favor and let us know what money the Giants lose if Andrews doesn't pan out. If he's not healthy, physically or otherwise, he doesn't make the team's roster and won't receive any salary.
'Nothing' isn't meant to be taken literally.
I agree with Alexander that I think that if somehow Dallas had made this move, it will be getting a lot more praise.
superpunk;3505187 said:Andrews got overrated to Larry Allen circa 2005 status after Madden drooled over him once or twice, he was really never that good, and we probably are aware of that. It's entirely possible that we simply thought our fat tubs of goo, as bad as they might be, are better than his fat tub of goo. The Giants may have had no other options. Keep in mind Parcells and Sparano are also intimately acquainted with and aware of his abilities, and they passed on him in favor of someone who will be joining the AARP soon.
hawklegion;3505169 said:I still say he is fat, makes Holland look like a ballerina.
BrAinPaiNt;3505194 said:You mean he does not get paid in pre-season or any practice or any signing bonus?
That seems to be the problem here. Miscommunication as I was being specific and you were not. No problem, it happens on message boards all the time.
I personally would not care for the move, but I am sure both you and alexander are right about others...take TO for example...most people hated him until he was a cowboy. I never cared for him and wished he was never signed.
:laugh2:Chocolate Lab;3505307 said:How could Jerry NOT sign him? There must be some mistake.
I mean, he went to Arkansas.
Alexander;3505096 said:Moreover, they had even less of an incentive to bring him aboard.
Their line is relatively healthy compared to the Cowboys. They are not missing two starters. Snee has a tweaked knee, but as far as I am aware, he's not scheduled to miss much time.
Putting it this way, I doubt there would be nearly as much dismissal of the move if the Cowboys were the ones kicking Andrews' tires. This thread would be filled with "low risk-high reward!" fist-pumping.
supafly;3505327 said:I wouldnt be surprised if they snatched him up to keep him from getting picked up by the Cowboys.
TheSport78;3504809 said:http://espn.go.com/blog/new-yorkgia...ews?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
The New York Giants signed former Eagles guard Shawn Andrews in the middle of the night, approximately at 1:45 a.m.
The team waived offensive lineman Cliff Louis. The move is intriguing considering if Andrews is healthy, he is a former two-time Pro Bowler. Andrews has not played since 2008 when he played for just two games before a back injury pretty much wiped out nearly two whole seasons.
Andrews' signing makes one wonder about the status of guard Chris Snee, who has missed several practices with a sore knee. Head coach Tom Coughlin said Snee was on his way back soon. The team's other starting guard, Rich Seubert, missed time earlier in camp with a broken bone in his hand but it is believed that he should be ready to play in the season opener.
The Giants, who close camp in Albany today with a light walk-through practice, have been using William Beatty at left tackle and their normal starting left tackle, David Diehl, at guard in place of the injured Snee.
dbair1967;3505346 said:well lets see...he's got serious "issues", a bad back, has hardly played any in 2+ years and constantly fighting to stay in shape...and you think we missed out? On what?
BrAinPaiNt;3505353 said:That whole bad back thing would really worry me. Even if he passed a physical now and looked good for a week...bad backs might feel better but they seem to be prone to return quite a bit. Plus the position he plays already puts a good degree of stress on the body and you just have to wonder how long before that bad back returns.
When I was younger, even just a few years ago I could tweak my back and it would be better after a short time.
This year I hurt my back and it has taken months to get better and still bothers me from time to time...and I am not in playing football in the trenches against 300+ lb strong guys trying to tear through me.
Now if it took him two years to get better or before another team took a chance on him...I would be kind of worried that his problems could start back up before long.