Did we almost have Thomas Rawls?

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,990
Reaction score
23,154
Stealing an old ladies purse........? Who does that? I mean, its one thing to shoot up some rivals of yours. Even steal from department stores and what not.



But an old lady????????????? Thats like the new "knock out" game these little ball of wonders are playing....

Thats just.................foul; were a long way from Kanas toto...

I read up on him when it was reported the Cowboys signed him. Sounds like he was at a diner at a casino and he and his buddys saw a purse lying on a chair with no one around.
 

perrykemp

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,503
Reaction score
9,274
I read up on him when it was reported the Cowboys signed him. Sounds like he was at a diner at a casino and he and his buddys saw a purse lying on a chair with no one around.

Obviously not the sharpest tool in the shed. It doesn't take a whole lot of TV viewing to understand that everything in a casino is captured on camera.
 

JoeBoBBY

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,631
Reaction score
1,691
I read up on him when it was reported the Cowboys signed him. Sounds like he was at a diner at a casino and he and his buddys saw a purse lying on a chair with no one around.


Ohhh.......I had a mental picture of him grabbing it from some old lady.

okay, thats different. they found it. And just kept it................wrong. But.....totally different. Thanks for that tidbit of info.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,351
Reaction score
32,735
There should be no excuse for us not to have drafted a running back. This was one of the deepest drafts for runningbacks and we needed a replacement for Murray.

It might have been a different story if we drafted one and didn't have to rely on Randle. This entire season might have been what we all expected it to be.

Really, the whole season and not drafting a running back gets a pass since Romo got injured.
A running back wasn't going to help us sans Romo, even if we would have taken Melvin Gordon or Todd Gurley. Look at the Rams. Without a deceit quarterback, they've been dropping games. And they've got one of the better defenses in the league.

But help is on the way. We'll be in position to get Ezekiel Elliott or Derrick Henry - both of whom I think will be good fits for this offense.
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,709
Reaction score
17,370
Which
Took less money to sign with Seattle
Is even more shocking because:

How you could look at the Seahawks with Lynch, Micheal, and Turbin and think he had a better shot there than here is mind boggling. Especially when you consider our history with UDFA....
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,704
Reaction score
12,423
He probably saw Seattle as a faster path to getting on the field with two 30+ backs on the roster, and he was likely right.

They had zero guys 30+ at the time. Lynch is 28 and had a new deal. Jackson wasn't on the roster.
 

kazzd58

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,146
Reaction score
584
Hind sight? I've stuck with the same opinions about how we did things even before the start of the season - and got ridiculed for it. Never liked Randle especially when he threw Bryant under the bus. It was my feelings all along - not hind sight.

ok I stand corrected I read here everyday and I see a lot of hindsight statements on here but I stand correct of ur belief was what it was from the get go
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,568
Reaction score
19,880
We should have just drafted him. Instead we traded a draft pick for another TE that will probably never see the light of day on game day.

We wasted almost half the season on Randle. Instead we could have had a running back like Rawls right now.

see the other posters. he had lots of red flags. so 32 teams past on him 7 times. his record was worse than randle. so now everyone wants to pick him. if we picked him, everyone would complain why are we picking risky characters.
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,405
Reaction score
10,074
see the other posters. he had lots of red flags. so 32 teams past on him 7 times. his record was worse than randle. so now everyone wants to pick him. if we picked him, everyone would complain why are we picking risky characters.

Using a low round pick on him would not be risky. Heck we traded for a TE that will never see playing time. If you want to spend a risky pick what better way than a low round pick.

Fact is that the Cowboys wanted him. They needed to draft a back to take the place of Murray.

But why did we wait till free agency rounds to finally offer him something?

We've been wasting our low round picks on useless projects. I don't see what would be wrong to use a low round pick on him.
 

cowboyschmps3

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,373
Reaction score
1,880
I remember checking after the draft and his guy appeared to have agreed then spending about him going to Seattle instead so we went with the guy from Georgia Tech.
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
Which

Is even more shocking because:

How you could look at the Seahawks with Lynch, Micheal, and Turbin and think he had a better shot there than here is mind boggling. Especially when you consider our history with UDFA....

He also could have spent 30 seconds on Youtube and seen the holes our OL opened for DeMarco last year.
 
Top