Murph80 said:In the 3-4 defense I am not so sure. Dat is a hell of a player I just don't think he is big enough for this style of D. Shanle is perfect for this D.
blindzebra said:Dat 238
Shanle 237
Hmmm.
Murph80 said:Dat 5'11 238 Shanle 6'2 237
Shanle Bigger
Eskimo said:We haven't missed Dat much yet because neither the Giants nor the Eagles tried to run the ball much. As for the Eagles, that is the nature of their offense. As for the Giants, they fell in love with Eli throwing and did not commit to the running attack - but they did run effectively when they tried to do so.
I really hope Dat will be back because I don't have much confidence in the James/Shanle combo against the run.
I agree on all accounts.WoodysGirl said:Word is.. Dat plays the run better than Shanle. Shanle plays the pass better than Dat. The last two games have been passing teams. Shanle shined.
Seahawks have a good running threat and a great QB. Dat will get his share of plays as well as Shanle, no matter who starts. JMO.
And to add... There will come a time when Dat will go bye bye, but he's still a productive veteran. Not sure why everyone is ready to push him out the door.
Yakuza Rich said:I'm really not sure why Shanle isn't starting outside of the fact he can play special teams better than Dat. According to Parcells, Shanle is a better cover guy than Dat and IMHO, he makes more plays.
Sure, I like having Dat around because he adds to the depth and is a good players. But, I honestly think Shanle is better.
Rich.....