Cowboysfan1975
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 832
- Reaction score
- 1,141
Pretty much the O line. Dak had time and Zeke had holes.
Swaim was pretty much the feature tightend.
Dak killed the drive once though with that stupid Houdini romo spin and got sacked taking them out of fg range.1 huge difference....not a single false start or holding penalty by the OL. We didn’t stop our own drives, and we needed every FG to win.
Defense gave up consecutive 75 yard TD drives at end of game.
I didn't get to watch the game, what were the differences in offense that Linehan hinted at?
I don't care about analysis like, "Dak played good, Dak didnt suck, Zeke played good, they completed passes". I can tell that from the box score.
Did they switch up routes, get creative, what offensive packages did it look like they ran moreso, type of blocking, etc?
They didn't drop a lot of balls
They didn't have a lot of penalties.
This allowed them to feed Zeke more.
I didn't get to watch the game, what were the differences in offense that Linehan hinted at?
I don't care about analysis like, "Dak played good, Dak didnt suck, Zeke played good, they completed passes". I can tell that from the box score.
Did they switch up routes, get creative, what offensive packages did it look like they ran moreso, type of blocking, etc?
One Giant step for ZEKEthis was already a big step forward.
lots of no huddle changed the tempo a lot and made defense much less comfortable
The line blocked finally. It as that simple. And they were finally determined to get Zeke fully involved in the passing game.I didn't get to watch the game, what were the differences in offense that Linehan hinted at?
I don't care about analysis like, "Dak played good, Dak didnt suck, Zeke played good, they completed passes". I can tell that from the box score.
Did they switch up routes, get creative, what offensive packages did it look like they ran moreso, type of blocking, etc?
I didn't get to watch the game, what were the differences in offense that Linehan hinted at?
I don't care about analysis like, "Dak played good, Dak didnt suck, Zeke played good, they completed passes". I can tell that from the box score.
Did they switch up routes, get creative, what offensive packages did it look like they ran moreso, type of blocking, etc?
Broken play and we got lucky then...
They used less receivers.
Minimal (maybe zero) snaps at WR for the 5th and 6th WRs (Thompson/Butler).
Only Swaim targeted at TE.
Run blocking less complex. Apparently Zack Martin insisted on simplifying the run blocking scheme.
After reviewing the Seahawks game, I noticed that some of their run plays were complex in regards to the blocking assignments. Run blocking play design is a tradeoff between trying to get everyone blocked for a long gain at the expense of making the blocking assignments too difficult vs making certain the blocks get executed but having some 2nd level defenders unblocked.
The pass protection seemed much better. I don't know if they changed anything or if they just played better.
When Dak is pressured less than 40%, his stats are great. He was great today. He made some incredible throws including a would-be TD into the hands of Austin that was dropped. There was another big drop and a play where the WR appeared to lose sight of the ball.
Dak dropped a deep pass into the hands of Zeke on the final drive that awesome.
It just dawned on me you may have been talking about the swing pass that went for a TD, and I was thinking of the downfield pass. The TD pass possibly could have been an audible - though easily may not have been either. Even if it was an audible that's not a slight at the team because that's what QBs are supposed to do when they go to the line of scrimmage and see the defensive alignment. It would actually a good sign that the team has coached Dak to recognize the situation. Regardless of which play you were talking about, there was no broken play.
