- Messages
- 98,049
- Reaction score
- 101,303
He didn't deserve to start.He deserved to be benched.
That being said, I'd start him again.
He didn't deserve to start.He deserved to be benched.
I'll need him to define "more experience", because Dinucci has already thrown more passes and played more snaps than Gilbert. Call a spade a spade. Say you need better QB play so you're trying someone else. The coddling of this team is ridiculous.
AAF MVP for what thats worth (he didnt officially get it because they folded but he would have)I just watched some clips of Gilbert. They were from college albeit but he looks like he has a good arm . Decent in the clips anyway.
Wow, what a backhand at the Egirls.What a clown show....
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...tt-gilbert-cooper-rush-qb-pittsburgh-steelers
"With the opponent we are playing, we need more experience," McCarthy said Wednesday.
That would be more productive than watching Dinucci’s cheesy sidearm s**t all game long.You keep three QBs on the 53 because you're two hits from a tight end or wide receiver taking snaps if you don't.
AAF MVP for what thats worth (he didnt officially get it because they folded but he would have)
His reps with the practice squad to evaluate? He was never in a real “live” situation like preseason.Seems like the coaching staff had a long time (many months) to judge DiNucci's level of talent. Now they are changing their opinion after one game? How about some confidence in your talent evaluation and decision making?
You just need to go to the custom section in their shop...
BAHAHAHA
BR, but according to the Dak haters...DiNucci at least is not Dak. LOLAgreed AC this young man does not possess the very basics . Arm strength no Pocket awareness no internal time clock positively not . Strange throwing motion check . He is capable of handing the ball off but we need more than that LOL
These Cowboys are so bad I don't watch John Wayne moviEs anymore.
No, DiNucci was deemed worthy of trying to develop, not of playing immediately. That's why they kept him as the #3 guy, and not the #2 guy that they had a greater expectation of playing and needing to win games for them. If they thought DiNucci was ready to play immediately Dalton wouldn't have been needed.I don't "find it unreasonable". The decision to make a change now is understandable, and is not the subject of my criticism.
I agree that the team probably never expected him to play this season. Yet, he was on the active roster, and deemed capable of playing. Often, teams have to resort to their 3rd string QB. The Cowboys have been lucky in recent years taking the very risky approach of keeping only 2 QB's. A player on the active roster should be capable of, well... actually PLAYING. I don't blame DiNucci, I blame a coaching staff that has mis-evaluated, and a GM that has underinvested.
Green Bay fields one of the league's best QB's (a first rounder), yet they used their recent first round pick on another QB. The Cowboys GM on the other hand, has invested a total of one late fourth round pick, and a seventh round pick, in the most important position on the team. Pretty clear which approach is more successful.
But Cowboyszone said anyone can play QB in this offense. Hell, a rookie Dak (who is obviously much worse than Dinucci) played well in this offense and he didn't have Gallup, CD, and Cooper!