theogt
Surrealist
- Messages
- 45,846
- Reaction score
- 5,912
My sleeper
12:38 PM Thu, Mar 13, 2008 | Permalink
Albert Breer http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg News tips
A couple days ago, I posted that the Cowboys' biggest need is in the secondary, and that tailback is third, also behind receiver.
And I got some emails on that. I know the Cowboys don't have a single tailback under contract. So my response there is that Marion Barber will be, and that means unless the absolute right guy is there, there's no need to select a running back in the first round.
Want another reason why? Check out the video above. And know that you can get Ray Rice with your second-round pick.
To me, he'll be a better pro than Chris Johnson, Jamaal Charles and the rest of the second-round prospects (although I'm going to have to take a closer look at UCF's Kevin Smith ... who intrigues me).
In fact, I think he's going to be a better pro than Felix Jones, too. Now, I think this draft has three elite backs in it -- Rashard Mendenhall, Darren McFadden and Jonathan Stewart -- and from there, it becomes a matter of opinion.
What I know about Rice is that he's got off-the-charts run vision (perhaps the most underrated quality at this position), plays low to the ground, absorbs contact and keeps moving forward, and is explosive in short areas. And he was enormously productive in college. And he played in a convential offense, making the translation to the pros more applicable. The biggest knock I've found on him is his height. Which is ridiculous.
Since when does a tailback need to be tall? I happen to remember back when the three best backs in the league were 5-10 or shorter, those -- at the time -- being Emmitt Smith, Barry Sanders and Thurman Thomas.
Either way, my point here is that the Cowboys can address needs at corner and receiver in Round 1, and then take care of tailback in the second round. Barber's the mailcarrier here. Fact is, you only start one player at his position. At corner and receiver, you start two guys.
Is that simplifying it? Sure. And if Mendenhall or Stewart is available at 22, which they won't be, then I wouldn't argue with picking either one. Otherwise, either address the other concerns or go for the best player available. That's the way you're going to get the most out of your picks.
UPDATE: Let me throw this out there -- if you get Malcolm Kelly, Antoine Cason and Rice, in that order, with your first three picks, you've done well.
12:38 PM Thu, Mar 13, 2008 | Permalink
Albert Breer http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg News tips
A couple days ago, I posted that the Cowboys' biggest need is in the secondary, and that tailback is third, also behind receiver.
And I got some emails on that. I know the Cowboys don't have a single tailback under contract. So my response there is that Marion Barber will be, and that means unless the absolute right guy is there, there's no need to select a running back in the first round.
Want another reason why? Check out the video above. And know that you can get Ray Rice with your second-round pick.
To me, he'll be a better pro than Chris Johnson, Jamaal Charles and the rest of the second-round prospects (although I'm going to have to take a closer look at UCF's Kevin Smith ... who intrigues me).
In fact, I think he's going to be a better pro than Felix Jones, too. Now, I think this draft has three elite backs in it -- Rashard Mendenhall, Darren McFadden and Jonathan Stewart -- and from there, it becomes a matter of opinion.
What I know about Rice is that he's got off-the-charts run vision (perhaps the most underrated quality at this position), plays low to the ground, absorbs contact and keeps moving forward, and is explosive in short areas. And he was enormously productive in college. And he played in a convential offense, making the translation to the pros more applicable. The biggest knock I've found on him is his height. Which is ridiculous.
Since when does a tailback need to be tall? I happen to remember back when the three best backs in the league were 5-10 or shorter, those -- at the time -- being Emmitt Smith, Barry Sanders and Thurman Thomas.
Either way, my point here is that the Cowboys can address needs at corner and receiver in Round 1, and then take care of tailback in the second round. Barber's the mailcarrier here. Fact is, you only start one player at his position. At corner and receiver, you start two guys.
Is that simplifying it? Sure. And if Mendenhall or Stewart is available at 22, which they won't be, then I wouldn't argue with picking either one. Otherwise, either address the other concerns or go for the best player available. That's the way you're going to get the most out of your picks.
UPDATE: Let me throw this out there -- if you get Malcolm Kelly, Antoine Cason and Rice, in that order, with your first three picks, you've done well.